Paper · 2011 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

THE EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON RADISH YIELDING

P. Chohura; E. Kołota

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In two field experiments carried out in 2006–2008, with two radish cultivars Treto F1 and Wernar F1 the effect of differentiated nitrogen fertilization on yield and biological value of radish grown for autumn harvest was examined. Mineral N content in the soil before seeds sowing was raised up to the level of: 50, 100 and 150 mg N·dm-3 by using: ammonium nitrate 34% N – [NH4NO3], calcium nitrate 15.5% N – [Ca(NO3)2·H2O], ammonium sulphate 20.0% N – [(NH4)2SO4], and ENTEC 26% N – [NH4NO3+(NH4)2SO4 + 0.8% DNPP]. The highest marketable yield of radish Treto F1 cv. was achieved in the case of ammonium nitrate use. In the case of Wernar F1 cv. kind of fertilizer didn’t affect the yield. Irrespective of the kind of fertilizer, increment of nitrogen content in the soil from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 caused the significant enhancement of radish yield. The similar yielding was recorded at nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3 and 100 mg N·dm-3. Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soil resulted in increment of nitrates content in radish roots, however their amounts not exceed permissible level. Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate gave the highest marketable yield for Treto F1 radish.

Material
Treto F1e0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest marketable yield of radish Treto F1 cv. was achieved in the case of ammonium nitrate use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer type did not affect Wernar F1 radish yield.

Material
Wernar F1e0
Treatment
kind of fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
didn’t affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the case of Wernar F1 cv. kind of fertilizer didn’t affect the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising soil nitrogen from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 significantly increased radish yield.

Treatment
nitrogen content in the soile0
Outcome
radish yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
100 mg N·dm-3e0
Comparator
50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increment of nitrogen content in the soil from 50 to 100 mg N·dm-3 caused the significant enhancement of radish yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish yield was similar at 150 and 100 mg N·dm-3.

Treatment
nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3e0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
100 mg N·dm-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The similar yielding was recorded at nitrogen concentration equal to 150 mg N·dm-3 and 100 mg N·dm-3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher mineral soil nitrogen increased nitrate content in radish roots, below the permissible level.

Treatment
Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soile0
Outcome
nitrates content in radish rootse0
Direction
incremente0
Qualifier
not exceed permissible levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing mineral nitrogen concentration in the soil resulted in increment of nitrates content in radish roots, however their amounts not exceed permissible level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate fertilization produced less nitrate in edible radish parts than ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.

Treatment
ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
nitrates in edible partse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ammonium nitrate and calcium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ENTEC 26 fertilization produced less nitrate in edible radish parts than ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.

Treatment
ENTEC 26e0
Outcome
nitrates in edible partse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ammonium nitrate and calcium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate and ENTEC 26 contained lower amount of nitrates in edible parts in comparison to those supplied with ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“RADISH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 107 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.