Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 gave maximum root ascorbic content of 37.17 mg/100g.

A claim from Influence of organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and their combinations on growth and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave maximum root ascorbic content of 37.17 mg/100g.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
75% NPK + 25% nitrogen through vermicomposte0
Outcome
ascorbic contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
37.17 mg/100ge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“radish (Raphanus sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128
e0

“The quality attributes viz. fiber content (763.67 mg/100 g), TSS (5oBrix) and ascorbic content (37.17 mg/100g) in roots were also reported maximum by the application of 75% NPK + 25% nitrogen through vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1484

Title

Influence of organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and their combinations on growth and quality of radish (Raphanus sativus L.)

Lalit Kushwah; RK Sharma; SS Kushwah; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2019

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-bd82c32acef2fa0e62509179e52df937e5bdc3450d97aa9085e8f7181b0026e5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.