Paper · 2019 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

The influence of mineral fertilizers and soil treatment methods on the yield of oats

Lyudmila Nikolaevna Prokina; Evgeny Nikolaevich Hvostov

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article summarizes the results of studies (2013 and 2018) conducted on leached heavy loam Chernozem in the Republic of Mordovia. The object of study is oats (Horizon variety). In the experiment, against the background of plowing, tillage and disking, the effect of mineral fertilizers was studied, which were represented by a complete mineral fertilizer (N32P32K32 –background), and fertilizing with mineral nitrogen in doses of 30 and 60 kg of active gradient/ha against this background. Analysis of oat yield shows that the collection of grain plowing in options without the use of mineral fertilizers (2.34 t/ha) had an advantage over the tillage and disking (2.15 and 2.04 t/ha), and in general, the experience increased the yield of oats by 0.43 and 0.53 t/ha. The maximum yield increases from the use of mineral fertilizers were obtained from the background of plowing, their value ranged from 0.49 to 1.03 t/ha compared with the option without fertilizers, there were less increases on the background of non-dump treatment of 0.21–0.57 t/ha and disking of 0.22–0.62 t/ha. Fertilizing with mineral nitrogen at a dose of 30 kg of active gradient/ha regardless of the methods of tillage showed an almost equivalent increase in the yield of oats by 0.20–0.24 t/ha compared with the background options (2.83, 2.36 and 2.26 t/ha, respectively, plowing, dump-free processing and disking). The most effective (an increase of 0.54 t/ha) was fertilizing with nitrogen at a dose of 60 kg of active gradient/ha against the background of applying a full mineral fertilizer using plowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers increased oat yield on the plowing background by 0.49 to 1.03 t/ha compared with unfertilized options.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasese3
Value
0.49 to 1.03 t/hae3
Comparator
option without fertilizerse3
Setting
Republic of Mordoviae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“leached heavy loam Chernozem in the Republic of Mordovia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–131 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum yield increases from the use of mineral fertilizers were obtained from the background of plowing, their value ranged from 0.49 to 1.03 t/ha compared with the option without fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers gave smaller yield increases of 0.21–0.57 t/ha on the non-dump treatment background.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
less increasese6
Value
0.21–0.57 t/hae6
Qualifier
non-dump treatmente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum yield increases from the use of mineral fertilizers were obtained from the background of plowing, their value ranged from 0.49 to 1.03 t/ha compared with the option without fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–966 · show in text ↑
e6

“there were less increases on the background of non-dump treatment of 0.21–0.57 t/ha and disking of 0.22–0.62 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizers gave smaller yield increases of 0.22–0.62 t/ha on the disking background.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
mineral fertilizerse3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
less increasese6
Value
0.22–0.62 t/hae6
Qualifier
diskinge6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum yield increases from the use of mineral fertilizers were obtained from the background of plowing, their value ranged from 0.49 to 1.03 t/ha compared with the option without fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–966 · show in text ↑
e6

“there were less increases on the background of non-dump treatment of 0.21–0.57 t/ha and disking of 0.22–0.62 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 30 kg of active gradient/ha gave an almost equivalent oat yield increase of 0.20–0.24 t/ha over the background options regardless of tillage method.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
Fertilizing with mineral nitrogen at a dose of 30 kg of active gradient/hae4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
0.20–0.24 t/hae4
Qualifier
regardless of the methods of tillagee4
Comparator
background optionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilizing with mineral nitrogen at a dose of 30 kg of active gradient/ha regardless of the methods of tillage showed an almost equivalent increase in the yield of oats by 0.20–0.24 t/ha compared with the background options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 60 kg of active gradient/ha on the full mineral fertilizer plowing background gave the largest oat yield increase, 0.54 t/ha.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
fertilizing with nitrogen at a dose of 60 kg of active gradient/hae5
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasee5
Value
0.54 t/hae5
Comparator
background of applying a full mineral fertilizer using plowinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilizing with mineral nitrogen at a dose of 30 kg of active gradient/ha regardless of the methods of tillage showed an almost equivalent increase in the yield of oats by 0.20–0.24 t/ha compared with the background options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1307 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most effective (an increase of 0.54 t/ha) was fertilizing with nitrogen at a dose of 60 kg of active gradient/ha against the background of applying a full mineral fertilizer using plowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing without mineral fertilizers gave 2.34 t/ha of grain, an advantage over tillage and disking.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
plowinge2
Outcome
collection of graine2
Direction
had an advantagee2
Value
2.34 t/hae2
Comparator
tillage and diskinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“the collection of grain plowing in options without the use of mineral fertilizers (2.34 t/ha) had an advantage over the tillage and disking (2.15 and 2.04 t/ha), and in general, the experience increased the yield of oats by 0.43 and 0.53 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across the experiment, plowing increased oat yield by 0.43 and 0.53 t/ha compared with tillage and disking.

Material
Horizone0
Treatment
plowinge2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
0.43 and 0.53 t/hae2
Comparator
tillage and diskinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The object of study is oats (Horizon variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“the collection of grain plowing in options without the use of mineral fertilizers (2.34 t/ha) had an advantage over the tillage and disking (2.15 and 2.04 t/ha), and in general, the experience increased the yield of oats by 0.43 and 0.53 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–768 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.