Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in central Greece to study the effect of two irrigation (I1: 100% ETo, I2: 60% ETo) and N-fertilization levels (N1: 244, N2: 184 kg ha-1), on the nutrients concentration of Cannabis sativa leaves (cv. ‘Fibranova’). The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw. The treatment I1F1, where the highest level of irrigation and N -fertilization was applied, compared to the other treatments, showed the highest dry biomass yield, however, in the leaves the highest concentrations of N, K, Mn and Cu were not observed. Moreover, it was found that the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively. These results could contribute optimal fertilizer application and therefore to the reduction of production costs of the crop. ********* In press - Online First. Article has been peer reviewed, accepted for publication and published online without pagination. It will receive pagination when the issue will be ready for publishing as a complete number (Volume 47, Issue 4, 2019). The article is searchable and citable by Digital Object Identifier (DOI). DOI link will become active after the article will be included in the complete issue. *********
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf N concentration of Cannabis sativa ranged from 2.8 to 3.51%.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativat0 - Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 2.8 to 3.51%e2
- Qualifier
- Ne2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf K concentration of Cannabis sativa ranged from 1.8 to 2.57%.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 1.8 to 2.57%e2
- Qualifier
- Ke2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Ca concentration of Cannabis sativa ranged from 1.96 to 2.17%.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 1.96 to 2.17%e2
- Qualifier
- Cae2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Mg concentration of Cannabis sativa ranged from 0.86 to 0.88%.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 0.86 to 0.88%e2
- Qualifier
- Mge2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf P concentration of Cannabis sativa ranged from 0.3 to 0.37%.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 0.3 to 0.37%e2
- Qualifier
- Pe2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf iron concentration of Cannabis sativa, the highest of the micronutrients, ranged from 129 to 139.8 mg/kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese2
- Outcome
- concentratione2
- Value
- 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dwe2
- Qualifier
- irone2
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e2“The N, K, Ca, Mg, P -concentration in the leaves was ranged by 2.8 to 3.51%, 1.8 to 2.57%, 1.96 to 2.17%, 0.86 to 0.88%, and 0.3 to 0.37% respectively, while by the micronutrients the iron showed the highest concentration that ranged by 129 to 139.8 mg kg-1dw”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest irrigation and N-fertilization treatment gave the highest dry biomass yield of Cannabis sativa compared with the other treatments.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Treatment
- highest level of irrigation and N -fertilizatione3
- Outcome
- dry biomass yielde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Comparator
- other treatmentse3
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e3“The treatment I1F1, where the highest level of irrigation and N -fertilization was applied, compared to the other treatments, showed the highest dry biomass yield, however, in the leaves the highest concentrations of N, K, Mn and Cu were not observed”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest irrigation and N-fertilization treatment did not give the highest leaf concentrations of N, K, Mn and Cu.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese3
- Treatment
- highest level of irrigation and N -fertilizatione3
- Outcome
- concentrations of N, K, Mn and Cue3
- Direction
- not observede3
- Comparator
- other treatmentse3
- Setting
- central Greecee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e0“A field experiment was conducted in central Greece”
e3“The treatment I1F1, where the highest level of irrigation and N -fertilization was applied, compared to the other treatments, showed the highest dry biomass yield, however, in the leaves the highest concentrations of N, K, Mn and Cu were not observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of N by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 28 to 35.12 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 28 to 35.12 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of K by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 18.01 to 25.65 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 18.01 to 25.65 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of Ca by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 19.6 to 21.7 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 19.6 to 21.7 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of Mg by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 8.34 to 8.75 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 8.34 to 8.75 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of P by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 3.01 to 3.70 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 3.01 to 3.70 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Removal of Fe by one ton of dry leaf biomass of Cannabis sativa was 0.129 to 0.140 kg.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- removale4
- Value
- 0.129 to 0.140 kge4
- Qualifier
- one ton dry biomass of leavese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e4“the N, K, Ca, Mg, P and Fe removal only by one ton dry biomass of leaves was ranged by 28 to 35.12 kg, 18.01 to 25.65 kg, 19.6 to 21.7 kg, 8.34 to 8.75 kg, 3.01 to 3.70 kg and 0.129 to 0.140 kg, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that the results could support optimal fertilizer application and lower production costs for Cannabis sativa.
- Taxon
- Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
- Outcome
- optimal fertilizer applicatione5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cannabis sativa L.”
e5“These results could contribute optimal fertilizer application and therefore to the reduction of production costs of the crop”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.