Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Effect of different tillage practices and nitrogen level on wheat production under inner terai of Nepal

Sampurna Bartaula; Urbasi Panthi; Anil Adhikari; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the plant height, yield and yield attributes of wheat under different tillage practices and nitrogen level at Dang, Nepal during winter season 2018-19. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with two tillage practices viz. zero tillage and conventional tillage as main plot factor and four level of N viz. 50 kg ha-1, 75 kg ha-1, 100 kg ha-1and 125 kg ha-1 as sub plot factor and each replicated thrice. The result revealed that there is no significant relation between tillage practice and plant height of wheat while N level significantly affect the plant height. 125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest plant height (110.7 cm). Zero tillage recorded the highest effective tiller m-2 (254) and grain yield (3.3 t ha-1) whereas spike length, grain spike-1, biological yield and harvest index were not significant with tillage practices. Regarding the N level, 125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1). 50 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest harvest index (42.9%). The interaction between the tillage practice and nitrogen level showed the significant effect on grain yield and harvest index where as other parameters showed non-significant relation. The zero tillage with 125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest grain yield (3.9 t ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect wheat plant height.

Treatment
tillage practicee0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant relation between tillage practice and plant height of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–567 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level significantly affected wheat plant height.

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N level significantly affect the plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest wheat plant height of 110.7 cm.

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
110.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest plant height (110.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage produced the highest effective tiller density, 254 m-2.

Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
effective tiller m-2e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
254e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage recorded the highest effective tiller m-2 (254)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage produced the highest grain yield, 3.3 t ha-1.

Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.3 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage recorded the highest effective tiller m-2 (254) and grain yield (3.3 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect spike length, grains per spike, biological yield, or harvest index.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
spike length, grain spike-1, biological yield and harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length, grain spike-1, biological yield and harvest index were not significant with tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest effective spike m-2 (279).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
effective spike m-2e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
279e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest spike length (10.6 cm).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.6 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain spike-1 (48).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain spike-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest thousand grain weight (46.3 g).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46.3 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (3.6 t ha-1).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.6 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125 kg N ha-1 gave the highest biological yield (9.4 t ha-1).

Treatment
125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.4 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest effective spike m-2 (279), spike length (10.6 cm), grain spike-1 (48), thousand grain weight (46.3 g), grain yield (3.6 t ha-1) and biological yield (9.4 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50 kg N ha-1 gave the highest harvest index, 42.9%.

Treatment
50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest harvest index (42.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and nitrogen level interacted significantly for grain yield and harvest index.

Treatment
tillage practice and nitrogen levele0
Outcome
grain yield and harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between the tillage practice and nitrogen level showed the significant effect on grain yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tillage by nitrogen interaction was nonsignificant for other measured parameters.

Outcome
other parameterse0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other parameters showed non-significant relation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with 125 kg N ha-1 produced the highest grain yield of 3.9 t ha-1.

Treatment
zero tillage with 125 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.9 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage with 125 kg N ha-1 recorded the highest grain yield (3.9 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.