Abstract
Protected cultivation of high value vegetables has tremendous potential and it has been gaining momentum from the last decade. With the progress of economy and the advent of improved technologies in agriculture, protected cultivation is being given lot of impetus. An experiment was conducted to investigate the influence of different protected structures on growth and yield of capsicum cv. Indira, in semi-arid region during 2017-18 and 2018-19 in the fields of AICRP on Plasticulture Engineering Technology, Raichur, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur. There were four treatments with five replications in the experiment consisting of different protective structures i.e., polyhouse, shade net and sides opened shade net with open field condition as a control. Protective structures had remarkable and significant influence on plant growth and yield parameters of capsicum. The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56), rind thickness (0.55 cm) and chlorophyll content (92.16%), with maximum yield (2.70 kg/plant & 85.39 t/ha). On contrary, the mean per cent severity of powdery mildew was more under open field condition (52.60) followed by poly house condition (48.40), whereas the severity of powdery mildew is less in closed shade net (16.00) and sides opened shade net (16.40). Added to this, the water and fertilizer use efficiency was more in polyhouse compared to other structures and open condition. The results indicated that there is a bright scope for cultivation of capsicum under polyhouse.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had higher plant height of 71.67 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had 13.90 branches, reported as higher.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had 75.56 leaves, reported as higher.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had higher rind thickness of 0.55 cm.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56), rind thickness (0.55 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had chlorophyll content of 92.16%, reported as higher.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56), rind thickness (0.55 cm) and chlorophyll content (92.16%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum yielded a maximum 2.70 kg/plant.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56), rind thickness (0.55 cm) and chlorophyll content (92.16%), with maximum yield (2.70 kg/plant & 85.39 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum yielded a maximum 85.39 t/ha.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The capsicum grown under polyhouse exhibited higher plant height (71.67 cm), number of branches (13.90), number of leaves (75.56), rind thickness (0.55 cm) and chlorophyll content (92.16%), with maximum yield (2.70 kg/plant & 85.39 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Open field capsicum had the greatest powdery mildew severity, 52.60%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the mean per cent severity of powdery mildew was more under open field condition (52.60)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse capsicum had powdery mildew severity of 48.40%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“followed by poly house condition (48.40)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Closed shade net capsicum had lower powdery mildew severity of 16.00%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the severity of powdery mildew is less in closed shade net (16.00)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sides opened shade net capsicum had lower powdery mildew severity of 16.40%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the severity of powdery mildew is less in closed shade net (16.00) and sides opened shade net (16.40)”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse increased water use efficiency over other structures and open conditions.
- Treatment
- polyhousee0
- Outcome
- water and fertilizer use efficiencye0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other structures and open conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the water and fertilizer use efficiency was more in polyhouse compared to other structures and open condition”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Polyhouse increased fertilizer use efficiency over other structures and open conditions.
- Treatment
- polyhousee0
- Outcome
- fertilizer use efficiencye0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other structures and open conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the water and fertilizer use efficiency was more in polyhouse compared to other structures and open condition”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend polyhouse cultivation of capsicum.
- Outcome
- cultivation of capsicum under polyhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there is a bright scope for cultivation of capsicum under polyhouse”
The same questions in other papers
protected cultivation · physiology: pigments · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
protected cultivation · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
protected cultivation · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →trap barrier · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.