Paper · 2020 · Weed Technology

Screening preemergence herbicides for weed control in cassava

Friday Ekeleme; Alfred Dixon; Godwin Atser; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Weed competition severely constrains cassava root yield in sub-Saharan Africa; thus, good weed control measures, including the use of herbicides, are increasingly important. Herbicide trials were conducted at five locations across eastern, western, and north-central Nigeria over two cropping seasons (2014 and 2015). Nineteen premixed PRE herbicides applied at different rates were evaluated for efficacy on weeds and selectivity on cassava. Manual hoe-weeding at 4, 8, and 12 wk after planting (WAP) and two S -metolachlor + atrazine treatments commonly used by cassava growers were included for comparison. Six of the 19 PRE herbicide treatments (indaziflam + isoxaflutole, indaziflam + metribuzin, flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, isoxaflutole, acetochlor + atrazine + terbuthylazine, and terbuthylazine + S -metolachlor) consistently provided 80% to 98% broadleaf and grass weed control up to 8 wk after treatment. Overall, PRE herbicide treatments and cassava yield were significantly positively correlated. Herbicide treatments terbuthylazine + S -metolachlor, flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, diflufenican + flufenacet + flurtamone (respectively, 60 + 60 + 60, 120 + 120 + 120, 90 + 360 + 120, and 135 + 360 + 180 g ha −1 ), acetochlor + atrazine + terbuthylazine (875 + 875 + 875 g ha −1 ), S -metolachlor + atrazine (870 + 1,110 g ha −1 ), oxyfluorfen (240 g ha −1 ), indaziflam + isoxaflutole (75 + 225 g ha −1 ), indaziflam + metribuzin (75 + 960 g ha −1 ), and aclonifen + isoxaflutole (500 + 75 g ha −1 ) contributed to yields exceeding twice the Nigerian national average of 8.76 tonnes ha −1 . These treatments had root yields of 1.4 to 2 times higher than plots that had been hoe-weeded three times. There were some adverse herbicide treatment effects such as delayed cassava sprouting and temporary leaf bleaching observed in indaziflam and diflufenican + flufenacet + flurtamone treatments, whereas sulfentrazone caused prolonged leaf crinkling. The PRE applications alone at rates safe for cassava did not provide adequate season-long weed control; supplemental POST weed control is needed about 10 WAP for satisfactory season-long control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six PRE herbicide treatments consistently provided 80% to 98% broadleaf and grass weed control up to 8 weeks after treatment.

Treatment
PRE herbicide treatmentse1
Interactor
broadleaf and grass weede2weed
Outcome
broadleaf and grass weed controle2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
80% to 98%e2
Qualifier
up to 8 wk after treatmente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed competition severely constrains cassava root yield in sub-Saharan Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six of the 19 PRE herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–657 · show in text ↑
e2

“consistently provided 80% to 98% broadleaf and grass weed control up to 8 wk after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–923 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE herbicide treatments and cassava yield were significantly positively correlated.

Treatment
PRE herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
cassava yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, PRE herbicide treatments and cassava yield were significantly positively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine listed herbicide treatments contributed to cassava yields exceeding twice the Nigerian national average of 8.76 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse1
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
exceedinge2
Value
twicee2
Comparator
Nigerian national averagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed competition severely constrains cassava root yield in sub-Saharan Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatments terbuthylazine + S -metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“contributed to yields exceeding twice the Nigerian national average of 8.76 tonnes ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those herbicide treatments gave root yields 1.4 to 2 times higher than plots hoe-weeded three times.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse1
Outcome
root yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.4 to 2 timese2
Comparator
plots that had been hoe-weeded three timese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed competition severely constrains cassava root yield in sub-Saharan Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatments terbuthylazine + S -metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1071 · show in text ↑
e2

“These treatments had root yields of 1.4 to 2 times higher than plots that had been hoe-weeded three times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indaziflam and diflufenican + flufenacet + flurtamone treatments caused delayed cassava sprouting and temporary leaf bleaching.

Treatment
indaziflam and diflufenican + flufenacet + flurtamone treatmentse0
Outcome
delayed cassava sprouting and temporary leaf bleachinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed cassava sprouting and temporary leaf bleaching observed in indaziflam and diflufenican + flufenacet + flurtamone treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfentrazone caused prolonged leaf crinkling in the cassava herbicide trials.

Treatment
sulfentrazonee0
Outcome
leaf crinklinge0
Qualifier
prolongede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfentrazone caused prolonged leaf crinkling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1919–1964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed competition severely constrains cassava root yield in sub-Saharan Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE applications alone at rates safe for cassava did not provide adequate season-long weed control.

Treatment
PRE applications alonee0
Outcome
season-long weed controle0
Qualifier
at rates safe for cassavae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PRE applications alone at rates safe for cassava did not provide adequate season-long weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1966–2068 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental POST weed control is needed about 10 weeks after planting for satisfactory season-long control in cassava.

Outcome
supplemental POST weed controle0
Value
about 10 WAPe0
Qualifier
satisfactory season-long controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental POST weed control is needed about 10 WAP for satisfactory season-long control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2160 · show in text ↑
e1

“rates safe for cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2018 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

herbicide · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.