Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Silicon enhances yield and nitrogen use efficiency of tropical low land rice

Sangita Mohanty; A. K. Nayak; C. K. Swain; et al.

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract High nitrogen (N) rate often leads to low yield of rice due to lodging and mutual shading. This study was conducted to ascertain whether silicon (Si) could enhance yield response of rice to higher N rate by enhancing rigidity of plant parts and improving photosynthesis. The effects of Si and N on crop growth, photosynthesis, N use efficiencies and yield of rice were investigated during wet season (June to November) in sub‐humid tropical region of India. An increasing trend in crop growth rate with Si at all levels of N was observed. Silicon reduced the flag leaf angle making the leaf more upright and enhanced flag leaf N content. Leaf chlorophyll concentration and single leaf photosynthesis rate were higher with Si compared to without Si at flowering stage. Both N and Si significantly affected panicle number and grain filling. Application of 200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 100 kg N ha −1 produced the highest number of panicle per square meter, filled grain per panicle and yield. Significant yield increases ranging from 8.2–16.9% were observed with Si compared to without Si. Both N and Si treatments had significant effects on N uptake and N use efficiency. Agronomic N use efficiency and N recovery efficiency were higher with Si compared to without Si. The highest physiological N use efficiency was recorded with 200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 80 kg N ha −1 . Silicon may enhance yield response of rice to higher N rate by improving source (photosynthetic) capacity and sink (reproductive organ) strength.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased rice crop growth rate at all nitrogen levels.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
at all levels of Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increasing trend in crop growth rate with Si at all levels of N was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon reduced flag leaf angle.

Treatment
Silicone0
Outcome
flag leaf anglee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon reduced the flag leaf angle making the leaf more upright”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon enhanced flag leaf nitrogen content.

Treatment
Silicont1
Outcome
flag leaf N contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced flag leaf N content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“low land rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“Silicon enhances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased leaf chlorophyll concentration at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll concentration and single leaf photosynthesis rate were higher with Si compared to without Si at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased single-leaf photosynthesis rate at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
single leaf photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll concentration and single leaf photosynthesis rate were higher with Si compared to without Si at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and silicon significantly affected panicle number and grain filling.

Treatment
N and Sie0
Outcome
panicle number and grain fillinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both N and Si significantly affected panicle number and grain filling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 kg silicon dioxide and 100 kg nitrogen rates produced the highest panicle number, filled grains and yield.

Treatment
200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 100 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
number of panicle per square meter, filled grain per panicle and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 100 kg N ha −1 produced the highest number of panicle per square meter, filled grain per panicle and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon raised rice yield by 8.2–16.9% relative to no silicon.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
8.2–16.9%e0
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant yield increases ranging from 8.2–16.9% were observed with Si compared to without Si.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and silicon significantly affected nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency.

Treatment
N and Si treatmentse0
Outcome
N uptake and N use efficiencye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both N and Si treatments had significant effects on N uptake and N use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased agronomic nitrogen-use efficiency and nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
Agronomic N use efficiency and N recovery efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic N use efficiency and N recovery efficiency were higher with Si compared to without Si.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest physiological nitrogen-use efficiency occurred at 200 kg silicon dioxide and 80 kg nitrogen.

Treatment
200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 80 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
physiological N use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest physiological N use efficiency was recorded with 200 kg SiO 2 ha −1 and 80 kg N ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

silicon dioxide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

46 papers: 43 positive, 3 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

177 papers: 164 positive, 13 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

218 papers: 202 positive, 16 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

silicon dioxide · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.