Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine capability of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescence survival on nanoprosil-1, vermicompost, rock phosphate, bentonite and three formulations of them and also, their effect on yield, growth indices and phosphorus uptake in maize. After inoculation of examined carriers with bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescence, inoculants were maintained in 28 C for 15 days and then till the end of 180 days in the refrigerator. Bacteria populations were measured at time 180 day through CFU method. Then inoculants were used for greenhouse culture of maize. The experiment was performed through complete randomized block design with five inoculants and two fertilizers treatments in four replicates. After 60 days, some plant growth indices and phosphorous in soil and shoot were determined. The results showed that use of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculants based on vermicompost and also the combination of vermicompost and nanoprosile-1 promoted growth indices, soil and plant phosphorus in comparison with control plant significantly (P 0.05).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculants based on vermicompost promoted maize growth indices and soil and plant phosphorus compared with control plants.
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculants based on vermicomposte1
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont - Outcome
- growth indices, soil and plant phosphoruse1
- Direction
- promotede1
- Comparator
- control plante1
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Then inoculants were used for greenhouse culture of maize”
e1“The results showed that use of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculants based on vermicompost and also the combination of vermicompost and nanoprosile-1 promoted growth indices, soil and plant phosphorus in comparison with control plant significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of vermicompost and nanoprosil-1 with Pseudomonas fluorescens promoted maize growth indices and soil and plant phosphorus compared with control plants.
- Treatment
- the combination of vermicompost and nanoprosile-1e1
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
- Outcome
- growth indices, soil and plant phosphoruse1
- Direction
- promotede1
- Comparator
- control plante1
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Then inoculants were used for greenhouse culture of maize”
e1“The results showed that use of bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculants based on vermicompost and also the combination of vermicompost and nanoprosile-1 promoted growth indices, soil and plant phosphorus in comparison with control plant significantly”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
695 papers more in this group
See all 699 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →fertilization · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.