Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2015 at College of Agriculture, V.C. Farm, UAS, Bangalore. The experiment comprised of thirteen treatments consisting of three levels of phosphorus (75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose) and various phosphorus biofertilizers and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizosphere (PGPR) and their combinations. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications. The soil type was sandy loam. The maize hybrid used was NAH-1137. The results revealed that the application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with PGPR II (Pseudomonas fluorescens + Bacillus megaterium + Azospirillum brasilense) improved the growth parameters viz., plant height, LAI, CGR and Total dry weight (TDW) of the crop. It also increased the yield parameters like number of rows cob-1, kernels row-1, kernels cob-1, kernel weight cob-1, cob weight, test weight and harvest index over the use of RDF. The kernel yield was significantly higher over control in all the treatments involving biofertilizers except with the application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with Bacillus megaterium.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilizer with PGPR II improved maize growth parameters.
- Treatment
- 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with PGPR IIe5
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens + Bacillus megaterium + Azospirillum brasilense
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense5symbiont - Outcome
- plant height, LAI, CGR and Total dry weight (TDW)e5
- Direction
- improvede5
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e5“application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with PGPR II (Pseudomonas fluorescens + Bacillus megaterium + Azospirillum brasilense) improved the growth parameters viz., plant height, LAI, CGR and Total dry weight (TDW) of the crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination increased yield components over RDF.
- Treatment
- 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with PGPR IIe7
- Outcome
- number of rows cob-1, kernels row-1, kernels cob-1, kernel weight cob-1, cob weight, test weight and harvest indexe6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Comparator
- RDFe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e6“It also increased the yield parameters like number of rows cob-1, kernels row-1, kernels cob-1, kernel weight cob-1, cob weight, test weight and harvest index over the use of RDF”
e7“application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with PGPR II”
Claim · model-written summary
Kernel yield was higher than control with biofertilizers except specified Bacillus megaterium combinations.
- Treatment
- treatments involving biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- kernel yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- except with the application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with Bacillus megateriume0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The kernel yield was significantly higher over control in all the treatments involving biofertilizers except with the application of 75, 100 and 125 per cent of recommended dose of phosphorus fertilizer along with Bacillus megaterium”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
102 papers more in this group
See all 106 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
478 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →fertilization · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.