Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during the two successive winter seasons of 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 in a private Farm in Bani-Ebeed District, Dakahlia Governorate. The aim is to study the effect of organic, bio, mineral fertilization and their interactions on yield and quality of carrot cv. shantenay. In general, it can be concluded that: 1- Fertilizing with compost gave the highest values of yield and quality of carrot comparing with untreated plants in both studied seasons. 2- Bio-fertilizing significantly increased yield and quality and the superiority was to the plants treated with bio-fertilizer mixture (Azotobacter, Bacillus circulans, Mycorrhiza) followed by EM. 3- Fertilizing with 100% NPK has achieved the highest values of yield however, 75% NPK gave the highest values of carrot quality. 4- The interaction among compost, bio-fertilizer (mixture or EM) and 100% NPK gave the highest values of yield however, compost plus bio fertilizer (Mixture or EM) and 75% NPK gave the superiority for yield and quality comparing with plants fertilizing with 100% NPK alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Compost gave the highest carrot yield and quality against untreated plants in both seasons.
- Taxon
- carrot
Daucus carotae0 - Treatment
- composte0
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- untreated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing with compost gave the highest values of yield and quality of carrot comparing with untreated plants in both studied seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization significantly increased carrot yield and quality.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Bio-fertilizing significantly increased yield and quality and the superiority was to the plants treated with bio-fertilizer mixture (Azotobacter, Bacillus circulans, Mycorrhiza) followed by EM”
Claim · model-written summary
The biofertilizer mixture performed best, followed by EM.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the superiority was to the plants treated with bio-fertilizer mixture (Azotobacter, Bacillus circulans, Mycorrhiza) followed by EM”
Claim · model-written summary
Full NPK gave the highest yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing with 100% NPK has achieved the highest values of yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% NPK rate gave the highest carrot quality.
- Taxon
- carrotDaucus carotae0
- Treatment
- 75% NPKe0
- Outcome
- carrot qualitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“75% NPK gave the highest values of carrot quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost, biofertilizer and full NPK gave the highest yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The interaction among compost, bio-fertilizer (mixture or EM) and 100% NPK gave the highest values of yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Compost, biofertilizer and 75% NPK were superior for yield and quality to full NPK alone.
- Treatment
- compost plus bio fertilizer (Mixture or EM) and 75% NPKe0
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- superioritye0
- Comparator
- 100% NPK alonee0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“compost plus bio fertilizer (Mixture or EM) and 75% NPK gave the superiority for yield and quality comparing with plants fertilizing with 100% NPK alone”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ
107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
117 papers more in this group
See all 121 papers →inoculation · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.