Abstract

Eugenia (Eugenia myrtofolia L.) is one of the most popular ornamental plant used in landscaping industry but success of rooting of this plant is very low due to its difficulty in propagating by stem cutting. Hence, this study aimed to: (1) determine the influence of different levels of Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) on the regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings; (2) determine the influence of bottom heat application on the regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings; and (3) evaluate the interaction effect of bottom heat treatment and the different levels of concentration of Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) on the regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings. This was conducted at NwSSU of San Jorge Campus, San Jorge, Samar. The experiment was laid-out in 2 X 5 split-plot arranged in RCBD with three replications. The Main-plot was rooting medium temperature manipulation (B1- bottom heat and B2- without bottom heat) and the levels of NAA (T1- o ppm, T2- 500 ppm, T3- 1000 ppm, T4- 1500 ppm, T5- 2,000 ppm, and T6- 2,400 ppm) was the sub-plot. Application of bottom heat in the rooting medium significantly increased percent rooting and number of primary roots. It also increased length of shoots and number and width of leaves regenerated Eugenia stem cuttings 30 days after potting. Moreover, regardless of bottom heat treatment, application of Naphthalene Acetic Acid significantly enhanced leaf retention; increased rooting percentage; number, diameter and length of roots; fresh and dry weight of roots; and roots starch and sugar contents. It also significantly improved the length and number of axillary shoots and number, length and width of leaves of the regenerated cuttings 30 days after potting. NAA concentration of 2,000 ppm was the optimum concentration for successful regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings. There was no significant interaction effects between bottom heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid application on the regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings and the horticultural characteristics of the regenerated cuttings after potting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottom heat significantly increased rooting percentage and primary root number.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
bottom heate0
Outcome
percent rooting and number of primary rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of bottom heat in the rooting medium significantly increased percent rooting and number of primary roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottom heat increased shoot length, leaf number and leaf width 30 days after potting.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniae0
Treatment
bottom heatt0
Outcome
length of shoots and number and width of leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
30 days after pottinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased length of shoots and number and width of leaves regenerated Eugenia stem cuttings 30 days after potting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly enhanced leaf retention and rooting percentage.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acide0
Outcome
leaf retention; increased rooting percentagee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Naphthalene Acetic Acid significantly enhanced leaf retention; increased rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA increased root number, diameter and length.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acide0
Outcome
number, diameter and length of rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Naphthalene Acetic Acid significantly enhanced leaf retention; increased rooting percentage; number, diameter and length of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA increased fresh and dry root weights.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acide0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Naphthalene Acetic Acid significantly enhanced leaf retention; increased rooting percentage; number, diameter and length of roots; fresh and dry weight of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA increased root starch and sugar contents.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acide0
Outcome
roots starch and sugar contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Naphthalene Acetic Acid significantly enhanced leaf retention; increased rooting percentage; number, diameter and length of roots; fresh and dry weight of roots; and roots starch and sugar contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly improved axillary shoot length and number.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acidt0
Outcome
length and number of axillary shootse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also significantly improved the length and number of axillary shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly improved leaf number, length and width after potting.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniat0
Treatment
Naphthalene Acetic Acidt0
Outcome
number, length and width of leavese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also significantly improved the length and number of axillary shoots and number, length and width of leaves of the regenerated cuttings 30 days after potting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bottom Heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid Application Affecting Adventitious Root Formation and Shoot Development of Eugenia (Eugenia myrtifolia L.) Stem Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 2,000 ppm was optimal for regeneration of Eugenia cuttings.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniae0
Treatment
NAA concentration of 2,000 ppme0
Outcome
successful regeneratione0
Direction
optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA concentration of 2,000 ppm was the optimum concentration for successful regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottom heat and NAA showed no significant interaction for regeneration and post-potting horticultural traits.

Taxon
EugeniaEugeniae0
Treatment
bottom heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid applicatione0
Outcome
regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings and the horticultural characteristicse0
Direction
no significant interaction effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eugenia
Eugenia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryCarlos Otávio Gussoni · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant interaction effects between bottom heat and Naphthalene Acetic Acid application on the regeneration of Eugenia stem cuttings and the horticultural characteristics of the regenerated cuttings after potting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–2046 · show in text ↑