Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth, Proline, and Some Nutrient Accumulation in Two Genotypes Seedlings of Ziziphus Spina-christi (L.) Willd

Abdolali Hesami; Leila Bazdar; Malek Hossein Shahriari

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil salinity in many parts of the world has become a very serious problem. Increasing soil salinity is one of the major abiotic factors limiting crop production in these regions. Therefore, growing salinity tolerant plants is a suitable way to optimize the use of saline soils. Ziziphus spina-christi (L) Willd is a fruit tree that grows wild in arid and semi-arid areas of south and southwest of Iran. The present study intends to illustrate the effect of salinity on the response of two genotypes of Ziziphus spina-christi to salt stress. The experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design as a factorial. Factor one was salinity (1.8, 5.8, 10.2, or 16.2 dS m−1 NaCl) and the second factor was two genotypes and four replicates for each experimental unit. After 10 months, the results showed a significant decrease in all studied vegetative characteristics (stem height, total leaves area, shoot and root dry weight, chlorophyll index and number of leaves per plants) with increasing the salt concentrations. However, this decrease was not of the same extent for both genotypes. Low levels of salinity (5.8 dS m−1) did not cause a substantial inhibition of growth but increasing concentrations of salt induced a progressive decline in vegetative characteristics. Potassium (K), phosphorus (p), and the K/Na ratio of leaves in both genotypes significantly decreased with increasing the salt concentrations. Leaves of genotype 2 displayed higher the K/Na ratio and K content than genotype 1 in saline and non-saline conditions. In both genotypes, proline increased with salt concentration. The proline also was significantly higher in the leaves of genotype 2 than genotype 1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem height, total leaf area and shoot and root dry weight decreased significantly with increasing NaCl salinity.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Treatment
increasing the salt concentrationse1
Outcome
stem height, total leaves area, shoot and root dry weighte1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in all studied vegetative characteristics (stem height, total leaves area, shoot and root dry weight, chlorophyll index and number of leaves per plants) with increasing the salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index and number of leaves per plant decreased significantly with increasing NaCl salinity.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Treatment
increasing the salt concentrationse1
Outcome
chlorophyll index and number of leaves per plantse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in all studied vegetative characteristics (stem height, total leaves area, shoot and root dry weight, chlorophyll index and number of leaves per plants) with increasing the salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salinity-induced decrease in vegetative characteristics was not of the same extent in the two genotypes.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Material
both genotypese1
Outcome
this decrease was not of the same extente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“this decrease was not of the same extent for both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low salinity (5.8 dS m−1) did not cause substantial inhibition of growth.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Treatment
salinity (5.8 dS m−1)e1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
did not cause a substantial inhibitione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low levels of salinity (5.8 dS m−1) did not cause a substantial inhibition of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium, phosphorus and K/Na ratio decreased significantly with increasing salt concentration in both genotypes.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
increasing the salt concentrationse1
Outcome
Potassium (K), phosphorus (p), and the K/Na ratioe1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potassium (K), phosphorus (p), and the K/Na ratio of leaves in both genotypes significantly decreased with increasing the salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1421 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of genotype 2 had a higher K/Na ratio and K content than genotype 1 under saline and non-saline conditions.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Material
genotype 2e1
Organ / stage
Leavese1
Outcome
K/Na ratio and K contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
genotype 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves of genotype 2 displayed higher the K/Na ratio and K content than genotype 1 in saline and non-saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased with salt concentration in both genotypes.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Treatment
salt concentratione1
Outcome
prolinee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both genotypes, proline increased with salt concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1603 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline was significantly higher in genotype 2 than in genotype 1.

Taxon
Ziziphus Spina-christiZiziphus spina-christit0
Material
genotype 2e1
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
prolinee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
genotype 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ziziphus spina-christi
Ziziphus spina-christi · TaxonDov Grobgeld · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Ziziphus Spina-christi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“The proline also was significantly higher in the leaves of genotype 2 than genotype 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1690 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Ziziphus spina-christi (Christ's thorn jujube)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Ziziphus spina-christi (Christ's thorn jujube)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.