Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agricultural Science

The Influence of No-till Farming on Durum Wheat Mycorrhization in a Semi-Arid Region: A Long-Term Field Experiment

Hassiba Hadj Youcef Taibi; Noria Smail-Saadoun; Sonia Labidi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maintaining a reliable and sustainable agricultural production system has become one of the major concerns of producers in arid and semi-arid regions. Simplifying farming techniques and practicing Direct Seedling (DS) could contribute to insure the sustainability of agriculture, preserving the natural resources and the environment. Direct Seedling based on limiting soil plowing has a potential number of benefits, including reduced production costs and soil erosion. Associated with the organic mulch, this technique improves the soil fertility and favors the establishment of root symbioses. Given the importance of the no-till farming techniques, the present research work aims to compare the effects of DS and those of Conventional Seedling (CS) on the evolution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf) roots, cultivated in the field for five years. Soil and root samples were collected during three different cropping stages at two different treatments. The results of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) root colonization kinetics have shown an increase in the percentage of arbuscules and a decrease in vesicles for plants sampled from a DS field compared to those from CS. Effects of the DS on the mycorrhizal parameters appears clearly in the fourth year of the experiment and continues in the fifth year, with an arbuscule percentage reaching 80% in a DS field and not exceeding 21% in a CS field. Soil phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) C16:1ω5 (biomarker of AMF) and C18:2ω 6, 9 (biomarker of saprophytic/ectomycorrhizal fungi) demonstrate that no-till practice improves AMF biomass and saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal fungal biomasses by 52 and 159%, respectively, in comparison with those found in a CS field. In both treatments, no-till farming and CS plots, the AMF biomass is higher than saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal biomasses. The natural biodiversity of AMF is also enhanced in a no-till field. In addition, an increase in the relative abundance of six families of Glomeromycota (Gigasporaceae, Diversisporaceae, Scutellosporaceae, Entrophosporaceae, Acaulosporaceae, Dentiscutataceae) was observed. To summarize, the present study highlights the importance of no-till practice as an approach to restore the microbiome in soils disturbed by tillage in semi-arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct Seedling increased arbuscules in wheat roots compared with Conventional Seedling.

Treatment
DS fielde0
Outcome
percentage of arbusculese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CSe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the percentage of arbuscules and a decrease in vesicles for plants sampled from a DS field compared to those from CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct Seedling decreased wheat root vesicles compared with Conventional Seedling.

Treatment
DS fielde0
Outcome
vesiclese0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
CSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the percentage of arbuscules and a decrease in vesicles for plants sampled from a DS field compared to those from CS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year four and five, arbuscules reached 80% in Direct Seedling versus at most 21% in Conventional Seedling.

Treatment
DS fielde0
Outcome
arbuscule percentagee0
Direction
reachinge0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
not exceeding 21%e0
Comparator
CS fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of the DS on the mycorrhizal parameters appears clearly in the fourth year of the experiment and continues in the fifth year, with an arbuscule percentage reaching 80% in a DS field and not exceeding 21% in a CS field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased AMF biomass by 52% relative to Conventional Seedling.

Treatment
no-till practicee0
Outcome
AMF biomasse0
Direction
improvese0
Value
52e0
Comparator
CS fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-till practice improves AMF biomass and saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal fungal biomasses by 52 and 159%, respectively, in comparison with those found in a CS field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased saprotrophic or ectomycorrhizal fungal biomass by 159% relative to Conventional Seedling.

Treatment
no-till practicee0
Outcome
saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal fungal biomassese0
Direction
improvese0
Value
159%e0
Comparator
CS fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no-till practice improves AMF biomass and saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal fungal biomasses by 52 and 159%, respectively, in comparison with those found in a CS field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF biomass exceeded saprotrophic or ectomycorrhizal biomass under both tillage regimes.

Outcome
AMF biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal biomassese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both treatments, no-till farming and CS plots, the AMF biomass is higher than saprotrophic/ectomycorrhizal biomasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1752–1871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till enhanced natural AMF biodiversity.

Treatment
no-till fielde0
Outcome
biodiversity of AMFe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The natural biodiversity of AMF is also enhanced in a no-till field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance increased for six Glomeromycota families.

Outcome
relative abundance of six families of Glomeromycotae0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the relative abundance of six families of Glomeromycota (Gigasporaceae, Diversisporaceae, Scutellosporaceae, Entrophosporaceae, Acaulosporaceae, Dentiscutataceae) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–47 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.