Paper · 2020 · BMC Biotechnology

Cassava/peanut intercropping improves soil quality via rhizospheric microbes increased available nitrogen contents

Xiumei Tang; Ruichun Zhong; Jing Jiang; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
105
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intercropping, an essential cultivation pattern in modern agricultural systems, increases crop yields and soil quality. Cassava and peanut intercropping systems exhibit advantages in solar utilization and cadmium absorption, etc. However, the inner mechanisms need to be elucidated. In this study, Illumina MiSeq platform was used to reveal the rhizospheric microbes and soil quality in cassava/peanut intercropping systems, and the results provided a reference for the application of this method in studying other intercropping systems. RESULTS: Both intercropping cassava/peanut (IP) and intercropping peanut/cassava (IC) systems significantly increased available N, available K, pH value, and urease activity, comparing with that in monocropping cassava (MC) and monocropping peanut (MP) system. However, there were few effects on the total N, total P, total K, available P, organic matter, protease activity, catalase activity, sucrase activity, and acid phosphatase activity. Both IP and MP soils contained more bacteria and fungi than those in the IC and MC soils, which were mainly made of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. Intercropping remarkably increased the number of Nitrospirae in IP and IC soils comparing those in MC and MP soils. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that the abundances of DA101, Pilimelia, and Ramlibacter were positively correlated to the soil quality. These results suggest that intercropping enhances the available nitrogen content of soil through increasing the quantity of rhizospheric microbes, especially that of DA101 and Pilimelia. CONCLUSIONS: The cassava/peanut intercropping system improves soil quality through increasing the available nitrogen content and abundance of DA101, Pilimelia, and Ramlibacter in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both intercropping arrangements significantly increased available N, available K and pH relative to monocropping.

Treatment
intercropping cassava/peanut (IP) and intercropping peanut/cassava (IC)e0
Outcome
available N, available K, pH valuee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monocropping cassava (MC) and monocropping peanut (MP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both intercropping cassava/peanut (IP) and intercropping peanut/cassava (IC) systems significantly increased available N, available K, pH value, and urease activity, comparing with that in monocropping cassava (MC) and monocropping peanut (MP) system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both intercropping arrangements significantly increased soil urease activity.

Treatment
intercropping cassava/peanut (IP) and intercropping peanut/cassava (IC)e0
Outcome
urease activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monocropping cassava (MC) and monocropping peanut (MP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both intercropping cassava/peanut (IP) and intercropping peanut/cassava (IC) systems significantly increased available N, available K, pH value, and urease activity, comparing with that in monocropping cassava (MC) and monocropping peanut (MP) system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had few effects on total nutrients, available P, organic matter and several enzyme activities.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
total N, total P, total K, available P, organic matter, protease activity, catalase activity, sucrase activity, and acid phosphatase activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were few effects on the total N, total P, total K, available P, organic matter, protease activity, catalase activity, sucrase activity, and acid phosphatase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping cassava/peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IP and MP soils had more bacteria and fungi than IC and MC soils.

Outcome
bacteria and fungie0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
IC and MC soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both IP and MP soils contained more bacteria and fungi than those in the IC and MC soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava/peanut intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were dominant in those soils.

Outcome
Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which were mainly made of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava/peanut intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased Nitrospirae in IP and IC relative to monocropped soils.

Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
number of Nitrospiraee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
MC and MP soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping remarkably increased the number of Nitrospirae in IP and IC soils comparing those in MC and MP soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava/peanut intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DA101, Pilimelia and Ramlibacter abundances correlated positively with soil quality.

Interactor
DA101e0other
Outcome
soil qualitye0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
Pilimelia, and Ramlibactere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the abundances of DA101, Pilimelia, and Ramlibacter were positively correlated to the soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava/peanut intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest intercropping raises available soil nitrogen by increasing rhizosphere microbes, especially DA101 and Pilimelia.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
available nitrogen content of soile0
Direction
enhancese0
Qualifier
through increasing the quantity of rhizospheric microbes, especially that of DA101 and Pilimeliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping enhances the available nitrogen content of soil through increasing the quantity of rhizospheric microbes, especially that of DA101 and Pilimelia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1585 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava/peanut intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–435 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · soil: chemistry · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · organism · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · soil: biology · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

intercropping · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · soil: biology · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.