Paper · 2020 · BIOtecnia

Effect of nitrates alone or with paclobutrazol on flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//Efecto de nitratos solos o con paclobutrazol en la inducción floral y producción en mango cv. Tommy Atkins

Moisés Morales-Martinez; Pedro Antonio Moscoso-Ramírez; Mepivoseth Castelán-Estrada; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The flowering induction in mango (Mangifera indica L.) orchards is an agricultural practice carried out on tropical regions to obtain fruits out-of-season looking to reach better sale prices. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of potassium (PN), ammonium nitrate (AN) and paclobutrazol (PBZ) on flowering induction and fruit production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins. The experiment included fourteen treatments with 2, 4, and 6 % PN, and 2, 3 and 4 % AN applied in combination with PBZ (1 g of a.i. m-1 of canopy diameter), paclobutrazol alone (1 g of a.i. m-1 of canopy diameter), and a control (water), which were arranged in a completely randomized design with three replicates. Results show that floral induction and fruit production were improved: PBZ followed by foliar application PN 2 %, 4 % or 6 % induced flowering 16 days after treatments. Likewise, the major number of emerged panicles were obtained with PBZ + PN 6 %. An increase on fruit weight and size reduction was observed at harvest. PBZ followed by foliar application of nitrates induced flowering and enhanced the number developed panicles in mango cv. Tommy Atkins.RESUMENLa inducción floral en mango (Mangifera indica L.) es una práctica agrícola común en regiones tropicales, tendiente a obtener frutos fuera de temporada para lograr mejores precios de la cosecha. Este trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar el efecto de tratamientos de nitrato de potasio (PN), nitrato de amonio (AN) y paclobutrazol (PBZ) sobre la inducción floral y producción de fruto en mango cv. Tommy Atkins. Los tratamientos con PN al 2, 4, y 6 % y AN al 2, 3 y 4 % fueron aplicados solos o combinados con PBZ (1 g de i.a. m-1 de diámetro de copa), PBZ solo y un testigo (agua) bajo un diseño completamente al azar, con tres repeticiones. Se midieron variables de inducción floral y producción de fruto. Los resultados muestran que aplicación foliar de PBZ seguida de PN (2 %), (4 %) o (6 %) indujeron floración 16 días después del tratamiento. El mayor número de panículas emergidas se obtuvieron con PBZ + PN 6 %. Se observó una reducción de peso y tamaño de fruto a la cosecha. El PBZ seguido de aplicaciones foliares con NP y AN induce floración y aumenta el número de panículas desarrolladas en mango cv. Tommy Atkins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ followed by 2% PN induced flowering after 16 days.

Treatment
PBZ followed by foliar application PN 2 %e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Value
16 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PBZ followed by foliar application PN 2 %, 4 % or 6 % induced flowering 16 days after treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ followed by 4% PN induced flowering after 16 days.

Treatment
4 %e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Value
16 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PBZ followed by foliar application PN 2 %, 4 % or 6 % induced flowering 16 days after treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ followed by 6% PN induced flowering after 16 days.

Treatment
6 %e0
Outcome
floweringe0
Value
16 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PBZ followed by foliar application PN 2 %, 4 % or 6 % induced flowering 16 days after treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ plus 6% PN yielded the most emerged panicles.

Treatment
PBZ + PN 6 %e0
Outcome
number of emerged paniclese0
Direction
majore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the major number of emerged panicles were obtained with PBZ + PN 6 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight decreased at harvest according to the Spanish result.

Outcome
pesoe0
Direction
reduccióne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Se observó una reducción de peso y tamaño de fruto a la cosecha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2144 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size decreased at harvest.

Outcome
tamaño de frutoe0
Direction
reduccióne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Se observó una reducción de peso y tamaño de fruto a la cosecha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2144 · show in text ↑
t0

“flowering induction and production in mango cv. Tommy Atkins//”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–112 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

paclobutrazol · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.