Paper · 2020 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Enhancing plant quality and outplanting growth of Acacia auriculiformis in dry wasteland plantations by inoculating a selected microbial consortium in the nursery

H.B. Raghu; R. Ashwin; J.E. Ravi; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In this study, the performance of a selected microbial consortium (Scutellospora calospora + Azotobacter chroococcum + Bacillus coagulans + Trichoderma harzianum) on Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. was evaluated through large-scale nursery trials at three locations in the Mandya district of Karnataka state, India. At each location, 500 inoculated and 500 uninoculated seedlings were cultivated. The increase in plant dry biomass of inoculated plants was 31% (mean of three locations) compared with uninoculated plants. The seedlings inoculated with microbial consortium under large-scale nursery trials were planted in wasteland at three locations, and their growth was monitored for nearly 6 years. At the end of the study, field growth of inoculated trees, measured as the biovolume index, was 52% higher than that of uninoculated trees. This study shows that the selected microbial consortium enhances nursery quality and midterm field growth of Acacia auriculiformis plantations on dry wasteland.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation increased Acacia nursery dry biomass by 31%.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformist0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
plant dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31%e0
Qualifier
mean of three locationse0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in plant dry biomass of inoculated plants was 31% (mean of three locations) compared with uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Acacia trees had a 52% higher field biovolume index after nearly six years.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformist0
Treatment
inoculated treese0
Outcome
biovolume indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
uninoculated treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of the study, field growth of inoculated trees, measured as the biovolume index, was 52% higher than that of uninoculated trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–71 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Acacia auriculiformisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.