Paper · 2005 · Functional Plant Biology

Symbiosis of Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium with mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium spp. improves salt tolerance in greenhouse conditions

Diégane Diouf; Robin Duponnois; Amadou Tidiane Ba; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
64
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of our work was to assess the growth and mineral nutrition of salt stressed Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth. and Acacia mangium Willd. seedlings inoculated with a combination of selected microsymbionts (bradyrhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi). Plants were grown in greenhouse conditions in non-sterile soil, irrigated with a saline nutrient solution (0, 50 and 100 mm NaCl). The inoculation combinations consisted of the Bradyrhizobium strain Aust 13c for A. mangium and Aust 11c for A. auriculiformis, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus intraradices, DAOM 181602) and an ectomycorrhizal fungus (Pisolithus albus, strain COI 007). The inoculation treatments were designed to identify the symbionts that might improve the salt tolerance of both Acacia species. The main effect of salinity was reduced tree growth in both acacias. However, it appeared that, compared with controls, both rhizobial and mycorrhizal inoculation improved the growth of the salt-stressed plants, while inoculation with the ectomycorrhizal fungus strain appeared to have a small effect on their growth and mineral nutrition levels. Endomycorrhizal inoculation combined with rhizobial inoculation usually gave good results. Analysis of foliar proline accumulation confirmed that dual inoculation gave the trees better tolerance to salt stress and suggested that the use of this dual inoculum might be beneficial for inoculation of both Acacia species in soils with moderate salt constraints.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced tree growth in both acacias.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main effect of salinity was reduced tree growth in both acacias.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation improved salt stressed Acacia growth relative to controls.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Treatment
rhizobiale0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
growth of the salt-stressed plantse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with controls, both rhizobial and mycorrhizal inoculation improved the growth of the salt-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved salt stressed Acacia growth relative to controls.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
growth of the salt-stressed plantse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with controls, both rhizobial and mycorrhizal inoculation improved the growth of the salt-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal inoculation had a small effect on growth and mineral nutrition.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Treatment
inoculation with the ectomycorrhizal fungus straine0
Interactor
ectomycorrhizal fungus straine0symbiont
Outcome
growth and mineral nutrition levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with the ectomycorrhizal fungus strain appeared to have a small effect on their growth and mineral nutrition levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined endomycorrhizal and rhizobial inoculation usually gave good results.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Treatment
Endomycorrhizal inoculation combined with rhizobial inoculatione0
Outcome
good resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endomycorrhizal inoculation combined with rhizobial inoculation usually gave good results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline analysis indicated dual inoculation improved salt tolerance.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangiumAcacia auriculiformisAcacia mangiumt0
Organ / stage
foliare0
Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Outcome
tolerance to salt stresse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of foliar proline accumulation confirmed that dual inoculation gave the trees better tolerance to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested dual inoculum may benefit Acacia under moderate salt constraints.

Taxon
Acacia speciesAcaciae0
Outcome
use of this dual inoculume0
Qualifier
soils with moderate salt constraintse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia
Acacia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGiles Laurent · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of this dual inoculum might be beneficial for inoculation of both Acacia species in soils with moderate salt constraints.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1484 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Acacia auriculiformisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Acacia mangiumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · growth · Acacia mangiumPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salinity · growth · Acacia mangiumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Acacia auriculiformisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Acacia mangiumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Acacia auriculiformisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.