Paper · 2016 · Forest Systems

Morpho-physiological response of Acacia auriculiformis as influenced by seawater induced salinity stress

Md Anamul Haque; Md. Mezanur Rahman; Sheikh Arafat Islam Nihad; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aim of the study: To evaluate the morpho-physiological changes of Acacia auriculiformis in response to seawater induced salinity stress along with its tolerance limit.Area of study: Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh.Material and methods: Three saline treatments (4, 8, 12 dS m-1) were applied to six-month aged Acacia auriculiformis seedlings from January 2014 to June 2014 and the tap water was used as control treatment. To observe salinity effects, the following parameters were measured by using various established techniques: plant height and leaf number, plant biomass, shoot and root distribution as well as shoot and root density, water uptake capacity (WUC), water saturation deficit (WSD) and water retention capacity (WRC), exudation rate, and cell membrane stability.Main results: Diluted seawater caused a notable reduction in shoot and root distribution in addition to shoot and root density, though plant height, leaf number and plant biomass were found to be decreased to some extent compared to control plants. Water status of the plant also altered when plants were subjected to salinity stress. Nevertheless, membrane stability revealed good findings towards salinity tolerance.Research highlights: Considering the above facts, despite salinity exerts some negative effects on overall plant performance, interestingly the percent reduction value doesn’t exceed 50% as compared to control plants, and the plants were successful to tolerate salinity stress till the end of the experiment (150 days) through adopting some tolerance mechanisms.Additional key words: Salt stress; halophytes; growth parameters; WUC; exudation rate; membrane stability.Abbreviations used: BSMRAU (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University); RCBD (randomized complete block design); DATI (days after treatment imposition); RWC (relative water content); WUC (water uptake capacity); WSD (water saturation deficit); WRC (water retention capacity); FW (fresh weight); DW (dry weight); TW (turgid weight); ROS (reactive oxygen species).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diluted seawater notably reduced Acacia shoot and root distribution and density.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Treatment
Diluted seawatere0
Outcome
shoot and root distribution in addition to shoot and root densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
tap watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diluted seawater caused a notable reduction in shoot and root distribution in addition to shoot and root density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“tap water was used as control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seawater salinity decreased Acacia height, leaf number, and biomass to some extent compared with controls.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Treatment
saline treatments (4, 8, 12 dS m-1)e2
Outcome
plant height, leaf number and plant biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
to some extente0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, leaf number and plant biomass were found to be decreased to some extent compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
e2

“Three saline treatments (4, 8, 12 dS m-1) were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acacia water status changed under salinity stress.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
Water statuse0
Direction
alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water status of the plant also altered when plants were subjected to salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acacia membrane stability indicated tolerance to salinity.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Outcome
membrane stabilitye0
Direction
good findingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“membrane stability revealed good findings towards salinity tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in overall Acacia performance under salinity remained below 50% versus controls.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
overall plant performancee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity exerts some negative effects on overall plant performance, interestingly the percent reduction value doesn’t exceed 50% as compared to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acacia plants tolerated salinity through the end of the 150-day experiment.

Taxon
Acacia auriculiformisAcacia auriculiformise1
Outcome
tolerate salinity stresse0
Value
150 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia auriculiformis
Acacia auriculiformis · TaxonMargaret Donald · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants were successful to tolerate salinity stress till the end of the experiment (150 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1552 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia auriculiformis seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–378 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Acacia auriculiformisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.