Paper · 2011 · Journal of Applied Horticulture

Response of Gaillardia aristata Pursh to salinity

N.K. Rao; Mohammed Shahid

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The performance of Gaillardia aristata Pursh, irrigated with saline water was studied with the objective to identify herbaceous ornamentals for saline landscapes. Seeds were sown directly into field plots of sandy soil and irrigated with saline water at electrical conductivity (ECW) of 2 (control), 5, 10 and 15 dSm-1. Increase in salinity reduced the plant stand by 38% at 5 dSm-1, 50% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1, in comparison with the control. Increased salinity also decreased the mean height, number of branches and dry weight of the plants, but the differences among treatments lower than 15 dSm-1 salinity were statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Compared with the control, the number of flowers per plant declined by 57% at 5 dSm-1, 61% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1. The differences in flower production among 5, 10 and 15 dSm-1 treatments were not significant (P>0.05). The flower diameter was significantly reduced at 15 dSm-1, but was not affected at the lower salinities. The results show that G. aristata could be successfully cultivated upto irrigation water salinity level 10 dSm-1 in sandy soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced plant stand by 38% at 5 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
5 dSm-1e0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salinity reduced the plant stand by 38% at 5 dSm-1, 50% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1, in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced plant stand by 50% at 10 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
10 dSm-1e0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salinity reduced the plant stand by 38% at 5 dSm-1, 50% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1, in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced plant stand by 67% at 15 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
15 dSm-1e0
Outcome
plant stande0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in salinity reduced the plant stand by 38% at 5 dSm-1, 50% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1, in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher salinity decreased height, branch number, and dry weight.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
Increased salinitye0
Outcome
mean height, number of branches and dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased salinity also decreased the mean height, number of branches and dry weight of the plants, but the differences among treatments lower than 15 dSm-1 salinity were statistically insignificant (P>0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower number declined by 57% at 5 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
5 dSm-1e0
Outcome
number of flowers per plante0
Direction
declinede0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, the number of flowers per plant declined by 57% at 5 dSm-1, 61% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower number declined by 61% at 10 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
10 dSm-1e0
Outcome
number of flowers per plante0
Direction
declinede0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, the number of flowers per plant declined by 57% at 5 dSm-1, 61% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower number declined by 67% at 15 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
15 dSm-1e0
Outcome
number of flowers per plante0
Direction
declinede0
Value
67%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, the number of flowers per plant declined by 57% at 5 dSm-1, 61% at 10 dSm-1 and 67% at 15 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower diameter was significantly reduced at 15 dSm-1.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
15 dSm-1e0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flower diameter was significantly reduced at 15 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower diameter was unaffected at lower salinities.

Taxon
Gaillardia aristata PurshGaillardia aristatat0
Treatment
lower salinitiese0
Outcome
flower diametere1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was not affected at the lower salinities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“The flower diameter was significantly reduced at 15 dSm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaillardia aristata Pursh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Gaillardia could be cultivated up to 10 dSm-1 irrigation water salinity in sandy soils.

Taxon
G. aristataGaillardia aristatae0
Outcome
successfully cultivated upto irrigation water salinity level 10 dSm-1e0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gaillardia aristata
Gaillardia aristata · TaxonAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. aristata could be successfully cultivated upto irrigation water salinity level 10 dSm-1 in sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1122 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Gaillardia aristata (blanket-flower)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.