Abstract
Abstract Ten herbaceous perennials and groundcovers were grown in raised beds from June to September in a dry, hot desert environment and micro-spray drip irrigated with synthesized saline solutions at electrical conductivity of 0.8 (tap water), 3.2, or 5.4 dS/m. Plant height and two perpendicular widths were recorded monthly to calculate the growth index. Landscape performance was assessed monthly by visual scores. Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment. Glandularia canadensis (L.) Nutt. ‘Homestead Purple’ performed better than Glandularia x hybrida (Grönland & Rümpler) G. L. Nesom & Pruski. Lantana montevidensis (Spreng.) Brig. had lower visual scores at 5.4 dS/m compared to the control and 3.2 dS/m. Most plants of Rudbeckia hirta L. did not survive when irrigated at 3.2 dS/m or 5.4 dS/m. Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water. Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect visual scores of Achillea millefolium L..
- Taxon
- Achillea millefolium L.
Achillea millefoliume1 - Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect visual scores of Gaillardia aristata Pursh.
- Taxon
- Gaillardia aristata Pursh
Gaillardia aristatae1 - Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect visual scores of Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’.
- Taxon
- Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’Lantana ×polyacanthae1
- Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect visual scores of Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’.
- Taxon
- Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’
Lonicera japonicae1 - Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity did not affect visual scores of Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’.
- Taxon
- Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’
Salvia rosmarinuse1 - Treatment
- Salinitye1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Salinity did not affect the visual scores in Achillea millefolium L., Gaillardia aristata Pursh, Lantana x hybrida ‘New Gold’, Lonicera japonica Thunb. ‘Halliana’, and Rosmarinus officinalis L. ‘Huntington Carpet’ throughout the experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Glandularia canadensis ‘Homestead Purple’ performed better than Glandularia x hybrida.
- Taxon
- Glandularia canadensis (L.) Nutt. ‘Homestead Purple’
.jpg?width=60)
Glandularia canadensise1 - Outcome
- performed bettere1
- Comparator
- Glandularia x hybrida (Grönland & Rümpler) G. L. Nesom & Pruskie1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Glandularia canadensis (L.) Nutt. ‘Homestead Purple’ performed better than Glandularia x hybrida (Grönland & Rümpler) G. L. Nesom & Pruski”
Claim · model-written summary
Lantana montevidensis had lower visual scores at 5.4 dS/m than at the control and 3.2 dS/m.
- Taxon
- Lantana montevidensis (Spreng.) Brig.
Lantana montevidensise1 - Treatment
- 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- visual scorese1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Comparator
- the control and 3.2 dS/me1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Lantana montevidensis (Spreng.) Brig. had lower visual scores at 5.4 dS/m compared to the control and 3.2 dS/m”
Claim · model-written summary
Most Rudbeckia hirta plants did not survive irrigation at 3.2 or 5.4 dS/m.
- Taxon
- Rudbeckia hirta L.
Rudbeckia hirtae1 - Treatment
- irrigated at 3.2 dS/m or 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- survivee1
- Qualifier
- Most plantse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Most plants of Rudbeckia hirta L. did not survive when irrigated at 3.2 dS/m or 5.4 dS/m”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of A. millefolium was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- A. millefoliumAchillea millefoliume1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of G. aristata was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- G. aristataGaillardia aristatae1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of L . x hybrida was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- L . x hybridaLantana ×polyacanthae1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of L. japonica was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- L. japonicaLonicera japonicae1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of R. officinalis was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- R. officinalisSalvia rosmarinuse1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot biomass of V. macdougalii was not influenced by irrigation salinity.
- Taxon
- V. macdougaliie1
- Treatment
- the salinity of irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Shoot biomass of A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , R. officinalis , and V. macdougalii was not influenced by the salinity of irrigation water”
Claim · model-written summary
A. millefolium can be irrigated with non-potable water up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
- Taxon
- A. millefoliumAchillea millefoliume1
- Treatment
- non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- growth and aesthetic appearancee1
- Qualifier
- little reductione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
G. aristata can be irrigated with non-potable water up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
- Taxon
- G. aristataGaillardia aristatae1
- Treatment
- non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- growth and aesthetic appearancee1
- Qualifier
- little reductione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
L . x hybrida can be irrigated with non-potable water up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
- Taxon
- L . x hybridaLantana ×polyacanthae1
- Treatment
- non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- growth and aesthetic appearancee1
- Qualifier
- little reductione1
Verbatim
e1“Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
L. japonica can be irrigated with non-potable water up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
- Taxon
- L. japonicaLonicera japonicae1
- Treatment
- non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- growth and aesthetic appearancee1
- Qualifier
- little reductione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance.
- Taxon
- R. officinalisSalvia rosmarinuse1
- Treatment
- non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/me1
- Outcome
- growth and aesthetic appearancee1
- Qualifier
- little reductione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Therefore, A. millefolium , G. aristata , L . x hybrida , L. japonica , and R. officinalis can be irrigated with non-potable water at salinity up to 5.4 dS/m with little reduction in growth and aesthetic appearance”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →irrigation · growth · Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
irrigation · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →irrigation · growth · Achillea millefoliumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
salinity · growth · Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
salinity · growth · Gaillardia aristata (blanket-flower)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- no effect
salinity · growth · Achillea millefoliumResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.