Abstract
In order to investigate the quantity and quality of irrigation on quantitative traits of Rosmarinus Officinalis L., an experiment was conducted in center of seed and plant production of IranShahr municipality in 2017. The treatments were laid out in single-split strip plots based on randomized complete blocks design with four replications. The treatments were comprised of irrigation regimes consisted of four irrigation levels (100, 85, 70 and 55 percent water replacement) in main plot and sub plot consisted of three water quality (groundwater, wastewater and integrated irrigation (50 percent with groundwater and 50 percent with wastewater)). Results showed that dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water. Also in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement, parsimony of water usage equal 348 m3 (15 percent) achieved. Moreover dry weight, number of shoots and plant height decreased 4.6, 6.9 and 7.1 percent respectively but water use efficiency increased 11.3 percent. According to the results, 85 percent water replacement with wastewater, in addition to saving water consumption, provides better use of soil moisture and sunlight. Thus this treatment can be considered as suitable approach to cope with the water crisis and achieve a sustainable agriculture.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Wastewater irrigation increased dry weight by 13.2% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wastewater irrigation increased number of shoots by 19.3% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wastewater irrigation increased plant height by 18.6% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wastewater irrigation increased water productivity by 13.3% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated irrigation increased dry weight by 4.1% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated irrigation increased number of shoots by 5.9% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated irrigation increased plant height by 5.4% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated irrigation increased water productivity by 3.8% versus well water.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots, plant height and water productivity in irrigation with wastewater increased 13.2, 19.3, 18.6 and 13.3 percent respectively and irrigation with integrated irrigation increased 4.1, 5.9, 5.4 and 3.8 percent respectively compared with irrigation with well water”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water replacement saved 348 m3, or 15%, compared with 100% replacement.
- Taxon
- Rosmarinus Officinalis L.t1
- Treatment
- 85 percent water replacemente0
- Outcome
- parsimony of water usagee0
- Value
- 348 m3 (15 percent)e0
- Comparator
- 100e0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement, parsimony of water usage equal 348 m3 (15 percent) achieved”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water replacement decreased dry weight by 4.6%.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots and plant height decreased 4.6, 6.9 and 7.1 percent respectively but water use efficiency increased 11.3 percent”
e1“in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water replacement decreased number of shoots by 6.9%.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots and plant height decreased 4.6, 6.9 and 7.1 percent respectively but water use efficiency increased 11.3 percent”
e1“in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water replacement decreased plant height by 7.1%.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots and plant height decreased 4.6, 6.9 and 7.1 percent respectively but water use efficiency increased 11.3 percent”
e1“in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced water replacement increased water use efficiency by 11.3%.
Verbatim
e0“dry weight, number of shoots and plant height decreased 4.6, 6.9 and 7.1 percent respectively but water use efficiency increased 11.3 percent”
e1“in comparison to 100 and 85 percent water replacement”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 85% water replacement with wastewater as a sustainable agriculture approach.
Verbatim
e0“85 percent water replacement with wastewater, in addition to saving water consumption, provides better use of soil moisture and sunlight”
e1“this treatment can be considered as suitable approach to cope with the water crisis and achieve a sustainable agriculture”
t1“Rosmarinus Officinalis L.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
irrigation · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.