Abstract
Energy-saving technologies of wheat cultivation limit the buffer role of the agrotechnical method in reducing the spread of root rot. This situation calls for using increased volumes of pesticides in order to decrease harvest losses arising from actions of harmful organisms, which does not allow to produce organic food.Considering this, evaluation of the efficiency of agrotechnical methods of cultivating spring wheat aimed at enhancing phytosanitary conditions of crops is very important. The goal of our work was to evaluate the role of predecessors, methods of soil preparation,organic fertilizers, new varieties of spring wheat, and the timing of planting in limiting the spread and reducing the harmfulness of root rot. Our study has been conducted in the forest-steppe zone of Eastern Siberia. We have established that green manure in crop rotationandfallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields. In the plantings of the new variety of spring wheat Marsianka, the spread of the disease was reliably less,and the yield was higher compared to the control variety Tulunskaya 11. The optimal planting date for the average of two years was May 25, the crops planted then compared to those planted on May 30 were 9.4% less affected by the disease and gave a reliable increase in the harvest of 0.15 tons/ha. Our studies have shown that during production of organic wheat we can limit the spread andharmfulness of root rot withagrotechnical methods.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Green manure in rotation reduced root rot spread and severity.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- green manure in crop rotatione0
- Outcome
- spread and severity of root rote0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Setting
- forest-steppe zone of Eastern Siberiae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“green manure in crop rotationandfallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields”
e1“Our study has been conducted in the forest-steppe zone of Eastern Siberia.”
t0“spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure and disc harrowing reduced root rot spread and severity.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cme0
- Outcome
- spread and severity of root rote0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot”
e1“fallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot”
t0“spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The green manure rotation increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- green manure in crop rotatione0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“green manure in crop rotationandfallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields”
e1“green manure in crop rotationandfallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields”
Claim · model-written summary
The manure and harrowing practice increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cme0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields”
e1“fallow arable land with introduction of 30 t/ha of organic manure fertilizer with a disc harrow to a depth of 10–12 cmreduce the spread and severity of root rot and increase wheat yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Marsianka had less disease spread than Tulunskaya 11.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Marsiankae0
- Outcome
- spread of the diseasee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- Tulunskaya 11e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the plantings of the new variety of spring wheat Marsianka, the spread of the disease was reliably less,and the yield was higher compared to the control variety Tulunskaya 11.”
e1“In the plantings of the new variety of spring wheat Marsianka, the spread of the disease was reliably less,and the yield was higher compared to the control variety Tulunskaya 11.”
Claim · model-written summary
Marsianka yielded more than Tulunskaya 11.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Marsiankae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Tulunskaya 11e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the plantings of the new variety of spring wheat Marsianka, the spread of the disease was reliably less,and the yield was higher compared to the control variety Tulunskaya 11.”
e1“In the plantings of the new variety of spring wheat Marsianka, the spread of the disease was reliably less,and the yield was higher compared to the control variety Tulunskaya 11.”
Claim · model-written summary
May 25 planting had 9.4% less disease than May 30 planting.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- May 25e0
- Outcome
- affected by the diseasee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 9.4%e0
- Comparator
- May 30e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The optimal planting date for the average of two years was May 25, the crops planted then compared to those planted on May 30 were 9.4% less affected by the disease”
e1“The optimal planting date for the average of two years was May 25, the crops planted then compared to those planted on May 30 were 9.4% less affected by the disease”
t0“spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
May 25 planting increased harvest by 0.15 tons/ha versus May 30.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- May 25e0
- Outcome
- harveste0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.15 tons/hae0
- Comparator
- May 30e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The optimal planting date for the average of two years was May 25, the crops planted then compared to those planted on May 30 were 9.4% less affected by the disease and gave a reliable increase in the harvest of 0.15 tons/ha.”
e1“The optimal planting date for the average of two years was May 25, the crops planted then compared to those planted on May 30 were 9.4% less affected by the disease and gave a reliable increase in the harvest of 0.15 tons/ha.”
t0“spring wheat”
The same questions in other papers
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →organic · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →rotation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
318 papers more in this group
See all 322 papers →rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.