Paper · 2000 · Acta Horticulturae

THE WATER RELATIONS OF MATURE `SUNDROP' APRICOT TREES IN RESPONSE TO DIFFERENT VIGOUR CONTROL TECHNIQUES

K. Arzani; G.S. Lawes; D. Wood

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the absence of dwarfing rootstocks for apricot, techniques which reduce vegetative growth are important in the orchard management system. A number of techniques may be employed to moderate vegetative vigour of fruit trees. In the orchard in the humid climate of Palmerston North, New Zealand, five-year-old vigorousSundrop' apricot trees on `Golden Queen' peach seedlings trained on Tatura trellis at 2000 tree ha -1 were used. The treatments were regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), dormant root-pruning, soil applied Paclobutrazol (PBZ) and untreated control. The objectives were to examine the effects of these treatments on the internal water relations of apricot. Also, to determine whether the mechanism of response to root pruning appeared similar to the mechanism of response to water stress. Throughout the season treatment effects on vegetative, reproductive growth and leaf physiology of the trees were monitored. Predawn and midday xylem water potential (Ψ xylem) in root pruned and water stressed trees were lower than in control trees, but Cultar treatments did not significantly affect this. PBZ treated trees had the same water status as controls. Root-pruned trees developed an increased internal water deficit in the leaves and fruits especially at the time of highest water demand during fruit stage III.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

root pruned apricot trees had lower predawn and midday xylem water potential than controls.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
root prunede0
Outcome
Predawn and midday xylem water potentiale0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predawn and midday xylem water potential (Ψ xylem) in root pruned and water stressed trees were lower than in control trees, but Cultar treatments did not significantly affect this.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

water stressed apricot trees had lower predawn and midday xylem water potential than controls.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
water stressede0
Outcome
Predawn and midday xylem water potentiale0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predawn and midday xylem water potential (Ψ xylem) in root pruned and water stressed trees were lower than in control trees, but Cultar treatments did not significantly affect this.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultar did not significantly affect apricot xylem water potential.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Cultar treatmentse0
Outcome
xylem water potentiale0
Comparator
control treese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Predawn and midday xylem water potential (Ψ xylem) in root pruned and water stressed trees were lower than in control trees, but Cultar treatments did not significantly affect this.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBZ treated apricot trees had the same water status as controls.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
PBZe0
Outcome
water statuse0
Direction
samee0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PBZ treated trees had the same water status as controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning increased internal water deficit in apricot leaves and fruits, especially during fruit stage III.

Taxon
APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
Organ / stage
leaves and fruitse0
Treatment
Root-prunede0
Outcome
internal water deficite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
fruit stage IIIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-pruned trees developed an increased internal water deficit in the leaves and fruits especially at the time of highest water demand during fruit stage III.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“APRICOT TREES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–53 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.