Paper · 2020 · Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Role of endomycorrhizae, rhizobacteria and compost to improve phosphorus availability in onion

Faiza Shahzad

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is 2 nd most important macronutrient for the growth of plants. The soils of Pakistan are alkaline and calcareous in nature which causes precipitation of P and making it less available to the plants. To overcome this issue, excessive P fertilization is used, some part of fertilizer is used by plants while remaining is either fixed as unavailable form or lost due to runoff. So deficiency of P affects the plant growth while runoff of excess fertilizer may result in eutrophication of our aquatic systems. Use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) may be an appropriate method to enhance the P uptake efficiency of plants and reduce the use of P fertilizers. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are also well known for solubilization of P. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted in 2019 at Research Farm of Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan to check the efficiency of compost, PGPR and AMF to enhance availability of P in onion. The impact of PGPR and AMF were evaluated separately and in combination. At harvest, data regarding plant fresh and dry weight, onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids, and P concentration in plants were analyzed. Results showed that combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria improved plant fresh and dry weight, onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids. Overall, integrated application of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria enhanced P uptake by 77% as compared to control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined endomycorrhizal and rhizobacterial inoculation improved onion plant fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
endomycorrhizaee0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
plant fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria improved plant fresh and dry weight, onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation improved onion bulb circumference and fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
endomycorrhizaee0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria improved plant fresh and dry weight, onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation improved chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
endomycorrhizaee0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b, carotenoidse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined inoculation of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria improved plant fresh and dry weight, onion bulb circumference, bulb fresh and dry weight, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated endomycorrhizal and rhizobacterial application enhanced onion phosphorus uptake by 77% versus control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
integrated application of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
endomycorrhizaee0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
77%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of endomycorrhizae and rhizobacteria enhanced P uptake by 77% as compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.