Paper · 1983 · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)

INFLUENCE OF LIGHT INTENSITY ON GROWTH, NODULATION AND NITROGEN FIXATION OF SELECTED WOODY ACTINORHIZAL SPECIES

M. E. C. Graça

20
claims
35
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Container-grown Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Myrica pensylvanica Lois., Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. and Elaeagnus angustifolia L. were grown at 20, 37, 53, 70 or 100% of natural light to determine the influence of light intensity on growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation. Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants. Acetylene reduction rates also were maximum in full sun and were highly correlated with chlorophyll content per unit leaf area, specific leaf weight and nodule starch content. Number and fresh weight of nodules as well as total N content in the plants was higher in full-sun-grown plants than in other light intensities. Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity. Plants in this treatment had more chlorophyll per unit leaf area, but less leaves than plants grown in full sun. Acetylene reduction rates were maximum at 70% light, but reducing and non-reducing sugars in the nodules increased with increased light intensity. Number of nodules followed the same pattern as sugars. However, fresh weight of nodules was not affected by light. For Elaeagnus umbellata, optimum shoot/root ratio occurred in plants grown under 70% light. Acetylene reduction rates were maximum in full sun, these rates were correlated with non-reducing sugars content in the nodules. However, greater total activity was obtained at 70% light, because of greater nodulation. Plants grown under light also had higher N content than plants grown in other treatments. Optimum growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia occurred towards high light intensities. Maximum rates of acetylene reduction and highest N content were obtained under full sun. However, number and fresh weight of nodules were not affected by light intensity. Results of these studies indicated that light intensity affected both growth and nitrogen fixation rates of actinorhizal species. However, there is an optimum intensity of which growth and nitrogen fixation are maximized which appears to be species-dependent with respect to light intensity. Supply of photsynthates through the light intensity appeared to be a factor in regulating nitrogen fixation rates, which in turn affected the growth in most of the species studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in plants grown in full sun.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae0
Treatment
full-sun-grown plantse0
Outcome
Optimum growthe0
Direction
Optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates of Alnus glutinosa were maximum in full sun.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae1
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates also were maximum in full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–342 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates of Alnus glutinosa were highly correlated with chlorophyll content per unit leaf area, specific leaf weight and nodule starch content.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae1
Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Qualifier
specific leaf weight and nodule starch contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates also were maximum in full sun and were highly correlated with chlorophyll content per unit leaf area, specific leaf weight and nodule starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number and fresh weight of nodules of Alnus glutinosa were higher in full-sun-grown plants than at other light intensities.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae1
Treatment
full-sun-grown plantse0
Outcome
Number and fresh weight of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other light intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number and fresh weight of nodules as well as total N content in the plants was higher in full-sun-grown plants than in other light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N content of Alnus glutinosa plants was higher in full-sun-grown plants than at other light intensities.

Taxon
Alnus glutinosaAlnus glutinosae1
Treatment
full-sun-grown plantse0
Outcome
total N content in the plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other light intensitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number and fresh weight of nodules as well as total N content in the plants was higher in full-sun-grown plants than in other light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Alnus glutinosa occurred in full-sun-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae0
Treatment
70% light intensitye0
Outcome
Optimum growthe0
Direction
Optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myrica pensylvanica plants at 70% light had more chlorophyll per unit leaf area than plants grown in full sun.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae1
Treatment
70% light intensitye1
Outcome
chlorophyll per unit leaf areae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
plants grown in full sune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in this treatment had more chlorophyll per unit leaf area, but less leaves than plants grown in full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myrica pensylvanica plants at 70% light had fewer leaves than plants grown in full sun.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae1
Treatment
70% light intensitye1
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
plants grown in full sune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants in this treatment had more chlorophyll per unit leaf area, but less leaves than plants grown in full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates of Myrica pensylvanica were maximum at 70% light.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae1
Treatment
70% lighte0
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates were maximum at 70% light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–919 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing and non-reducing sugars in the nodules of Myrica pensylvanica increased with increased light intensity.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae1
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
increased light intensitye0
Outcome
reducing and non-reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing and non-reducing sugars in the nodules increased with increased light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight of nodules of Myrica pensylvanica was not affected by light.

Taxon
Myrica pensylvanicaMorella pensylvanicae1
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
fresh weight of nodulese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morella pensylvanica
Morella pensylvanica · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of nodules was not affected by light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Myrica pensylvanica occurred in plants grown under 70% light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum shoot/root ratio of Elaeagnus umbellata occurred in plants grown under 70% light.

Taxon
Elaeagnus umbellataElaeagnus umbellatae0
Treatment
70% lighte0
Outcome
optimum shoot/root ratioe0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus umbellata
Elaeagnus umbellata · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Elaeagnus umbellata, optimum shoot/root ratio occurred in plants grown under 70% light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates of Elaeagnus umbellata were maximum in full sun.

Taxon
Elaeagnus umbellataElaeagnus umbellatae1
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus umbellata
Elaeagnus umbellata · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates were maximum in full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“For Elaeagnus umbellata, optimum shoot/root ratio occurred in plants grown under 70% light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetylene reduction rates of Elaeagnus umbellata were correlated with non-reducing sugars content in the nodules.

Taxon
Elaeagnus umbellataElaeagnus umbellatae1
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Compound
non-reducing sugarse0
Outcome
Acetylene reduction ratese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus umbellata
Elaeagnus umbellata · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetylene reduction rates were maximum in full sun, these rates were correlated with non-reducing sugars content in the nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“For Elaeagnus umbellata, optimum shoot/root ratio occurred in plants grown under 70% light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elaeagnus umbellata plants grown under light had higher N content than plants grown in other treatments.

Taxon
Elaeagnus umbellataElaeagnus umbellatae1
Treatment
Plants grown under lighte0
Outcome
N contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
plants grown in other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus umbellata
Elaeagnus umbellata · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown under light also had higher N content than plants grown in other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 · show in text ↑
e1

“For Elaeagnus umbellata, optimum shoot/root ratio occurred in plants grown under 70% light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia occurred towards high light intensities.

Taxon
Elaeagnus angustifoliaElaeagnus angustifoliae0
Treatment
high light intensitiese0
Outcome
Optimum growthe0
Direction
Optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus angustifolia
Elaeagnus angustifolia · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia occurred towards high light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elaeagnus angustifolia had maximum acetylene reduction rates and highest N content under full sun.

Taxon
Elaeagnus angustifoliaElaeagnus angustifoliae1
Treatment
full sune0
Outcome
Maximum rates of acetylene reduction and highest N contente0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus angustifolia
Elaeagnus angustifolia · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum rates of acetylene reduction and highest N content were obtained under full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1700 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia occurred towards high light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number and fresh weight of nodules of Elaeagnus angustifolia were not affected by light intensity.

Taxon
Elaeagnus angustifoliaElaeagnus angustifoliae1
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
number and fresh weight of nodulese0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Elaeagnus angustifolia
Elaeagnus angustifolia · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number and fresh weight of nodules were not affected by light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Optimum growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia occurred towards high light intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity affected both growth and nitrogen fixation rates of the actinorhizal species studied.

Taxon
actinorhizal speciese0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Outcome
growth and nitrogen fixation ratese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Results of these studies indicated that light intensity affected both growth and nitrogen fixation rates of actinorhizal species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1912 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supply of photosynthates through light intensity appeared to regulate nitrogen fixation rates, which in turn affected growth in most of the species studied.

Taxon
ACTINORHIZAL SPECIESt0
Treatment
light intensitye0
Compound
photsynthatese0
Outcome
nitrogen fixation ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“Supply of photsynthates through the light intensity appeared to be a factor in regulating nitrogen fixation rates, which in turn affected the growth in most of the species studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2255 · show in text ↑
t0

“SELECTED WOODY ACTINORHIZAL SPECIES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–111 · show in text ↑

light · symbiosis · Alnus glutinosaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

light · growth · Alnus glutinosaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.