Paper · 2020 · GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Optimization of auxin-cytokinin combination for rapid proliferation of adventitious buds of date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid

Elmaataoui Saida; Mazri Mouaad Amine; Meziani Reda; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of various plant growth regulator (PGR) combinations on adventitious shoot bud multiplication of date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid. In the first experiment, we assessed the effect of four PGR combinations that have already shown good results in other date palm cultivars: half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium (MS/2) supplemented with 0.5 mg/L 2-naphthoxyacetic acid (NOA) and 0.5 mg/L kinetin (KIN); MS/2 supplemented with 0.2 mg/L NOA, 0.2 mg/L indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 0.4 mg/L 6-(dimethylallylamino)purine (2iP) and 0.4 mg/L KIN; MS/2 supplemented with 0.5 mg/L 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 0.5 mg/L KIN and finally MS/2 supplemented with 0.5 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and 0.6 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP). Our results showed no significant difference among the four culture media in terms of adventitious shoot bud multiplication (26.7-28.4 adventitious buds per explant). However, the medium containing 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KIN showed significantly lower rate of precocious rooting and thus this auxin-cytokinin combination was chosen for the second experiment. In the second experiment, we evaluated the effects of various NOA and KIN concentrations on adventitious shoot bud multiplication: 0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/L of each PGR, either alone or in combination. It was found that the combination of 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KIN is still the most appropriate for adventitious shoot bud multiplication. Shoot elongation and rooting were achieved on PGR-free MS/2 medium and a high acclimatization rate of 70% was observed in the greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The four media did not differ significantly in date palm bud multiplication, producing 26.7–28.4 buds per explant.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Material
Aziza Bouzidt0
Treatment
four culture mediae0
Outcome
adventitious shoot bud multiplicatione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Value
26.7-28.4 adventitious buds per explante0
Comparator
four culture mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results showed no significant difference among the four culture media in terms of adventitious shoot bud multiplication (26.7-28.4 adventitious buds per explant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The medium with 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KIN significantly reduced precocious rooting relative to other media.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Material
Aziza Bouzidt0
Treatment
0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KINe0
Outcome
rate of precocious rootinge0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the medium containing 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KIN showed significantly lower rate of precocious rooting and thus this auxin-cytokinin combination was chosen for the second experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified 0.5 mg/L NOA plus 0.5 mg/L KIN as the most appropriate combination for bud multiplication.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Material
Aziza Bouzidt0
Outcome
combination of 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KINe0
Qualifier
adventitious shoot bud multiplicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was found that the combination of 0.5 mg/L NOA and 0.5 mg/L KIN is still the most appropriate for adventitious shoot bud multiplication.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot elongation and rooting were achieved on regulator-free MS/2 medium.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Material
Aziza Bouzidt0
Treatment
PGR-free MS/2 mediume0
Outcome
Shoot elongation and rootinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot elongation and rooting were achieved on PGR-free MS/2 medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm acclimatization in the greenhouse reached 70%.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Material
Aziza Bouzidt0
Outcome
acclimatization ratee0
Direction
highe0
Value
70%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high acclimatization rate of 70% was observed in the greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“date palm cv. Aziza Bouzid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–118 · show in text ↑

kinetin · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2-naphthyloxyacetic acid · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · pest · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

class · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

in vitro · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.