Paper · 2020 · Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology

Agronomic Evaluation of Fodder Sorghum Varieties under Different Dates of Sowing

K. Saimaheswari; T. Prathima; D. Subramanyam; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study conducted during the summer season of 2018 at S.V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, to evaluate the sowing time and varieties on growth, yield and quality of fodder sorghum. The results revealed that plant height, dry matter production, leaf area, stem diameter, leaf stem ratio significantly decreased with delay in sowing from I FN of January to II FN of February at all stages of plant growth. Significantly higher crude protein and ash contents were observed with the crop sown during I fortnight of January. Late sowing of the crop during II fortnight of February recorded higher crude fibre. Among various varieties tested, higher growth parameters, green and dry fodder yields were recorded with CSV 32 F than rest of varieties. CSV 32 F has recorded highest crude protein and ash content, while the higher crude fibre content was recorded with CSV 21 F. The highest gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio were obtained when the crop is sown during I FN of January which was significantly superior to other times of sowing. Among tested varieties, CSV 32 F variety recorded significantly higher returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed sowing significantly decreased height, dry matter, leaf area, stem diameter and leaf stem ratio.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Treatment
delay in sowinge0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter production, leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
I FN of Januarye0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height, dry matter production, leaf area, stem diameter, leaf stem ratio significantly decreased with delay in sowing from I FN of January to II FN of February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early January sowing had higher crude protein and ash.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Treatment
I fortnight of Januarye0
Outcome
crude protein and ash contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher crude protein and ash contents were observed with the crop sown during I fortnight of January.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late February sowing had higher crude fibre.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Treatment
II fortnight of Februarye0
Outcome
crude fibree0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Late sowing of the crop during II fortnight of February recorded higher crude fibre.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–626 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSV 32 F had higher growth and green and dry fodder yield than other varieties.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Material
CSV 32 Fe0
Outcome
green and dry fodder yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of varietiese0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher growth parameters, green and dry fodder yields were recorded with CSV 32 F than rest of varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSV 32 F had the highest crude protein and ash.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Material
CSV 32 Fe0
Outcome
crude protein and ash contente0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“CSV 32 F has recorded highest crude protein and ash content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–824 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSV 21 F had higher crude fibre.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Material
CSV 21 Fe0
Outcome
crude fibre contente0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher crude fibre content was recorded with CSV 21 F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early January sowing produced the highest gross and net returns and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Treatment
I FN of Januarye0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other times of sowinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio were obtained when the crop is sown during I FN of January which was significantly superior to other times of sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1070 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSV 32 F produced significantly higher returns.

Taxon
Fodder Sorghumt0
Material
CSV 32 Fe0
Outcome
returnse0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“CSV 32 F variety recorded significantly higher returns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1150 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.