Paper · 2020 · Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)

Interactional effects of climate change factors on the water status, photosynthetic rate, and metabolic regulation in peach

Jiménez, S. (Sergio); Fattahi, M. (Masoud); Bedis, K. (Khaoula); et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Environmental stress factors caused by climate change affect plant growth and crop production, and pose a growing threat to sustainable agriculture, especially for tree crops. In this context, we sought to investigate the responses to climate change of two Prunus rootstocks (GF677 and Adesoto) budded with Catherina peach cultivar. Plants were grown in 15 L pots in temperature gradient greenhouses for an 18 days acclimation period after which six treatments were applied: [CO2 levels (400 versus 700 mol mol-1), temperature (ambient versus ambient + 4°C), and water availability (well irrigated versus drought)]. After 23 days, the effects of stress were evaluated as changes in physiological and biochemical traits, including expression of relevant genes. Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in plants grafted on GF677 and Adesoto rootstocks; however, elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently in both combinations. The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions. The photosynthetic rates of plants grafted onto Adesoto were only affected by drought treatment. Furthermore, in GF677-Catherina plants, elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought, whereas in those grafted onto Adesoto, the same condition produced acclimation in the rate. Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2and drought stress in both graftedrootstocks, and the combination of these conditions improved water-use efficiency.Changes in the sugar content in scion leaves and roots were significantly differentunder the stress conditions in both combinations. Meanwhile, the expression of mostof the assessed genes was significantly affected by treatment. Regarding genotypes,GF677 rootstock showed more changes at the molecular and transcriptomic level thandid Adesoto rootstock. A coordinated shift was found between the physiological statusand the transcriptomic responses. This study revealed adaptive responses to climatechange at the physiological, metabolic, and transcriptomic levels in twoPrunusrootstocks budded with 'Catherina'. Overall, these results demonstrate the resilient capacity andplasticity of these contrasting genotypes, which can be further used to combat ongoingclimate changes and support sustainable peach production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stem water potential on GF677 and Adesoto rootstocks.

Material
GF677 and Adesoto rootstockse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Stem water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in plants grafted on GF677 and Adesoto rootstocks; however, elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently in both combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 and temperature affected water content differently across rootstock combinations.

Material
both combinationse0
Outcome
plant water contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem water potential decreased under drought stress in plants grafted on GF677 and Adesoto rootstocks; however, elevated CO2 and temperature affected plant water content differently in both combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 increased photosynthetic rate on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature reduced photosynthetic rate on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced photosynthetic rate on GF677.

Material
GF677e0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate of plants grafted on GF677 increased under high CO2, but decreased under high temperature and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only drought affected photosynthetic rates on Adesoto.

Material
Adesotoe0
Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rates of plants grafted onto Adesoto were only affected by drought treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 alleviated the drought effect in GF677-Catherina plants.

Material
GF677-Catherinae0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
effect of droughte0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, in GF677-Catherina plants, elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought, whereas in those grafted onto Adesoto, the same condition produced acclimation in the rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 produced acclimation of photosynthetic rate on Adesoto.

Material
Adesotoe0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
acclimation in the ratee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, in GF677-Catherina plants, elevated CO2 alleviated the effect of drought, whereas in those grafted onto Adesoto, the same condition produced acclimation in the rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 and drought reduced stomatal conductance in both rootstocks.

Treatment
high CO2and drought stresse0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2and drought stress in both graftedrootstocks, and the combination of these conditions improved water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high CO2 and drought improved water use efficiency.

Treatment
combination of these conditionse0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance decreased under high CO2and drought stress in both graftedrootstocks, and the combination of these conditions improved water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion leaf and root sugar content differed significantly under stress in both graft combinations.

Organ / stage
scion leaves and rootse0
Outcome
sugar content in scion leaves and rootse0
Direction
differentundere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the sugar content in scion leaves and roots were significantly differentunder the stress conditions in both combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment significantly affected expression of most assessed genes.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
expression of mostof the assessed genese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meanwhile, the expression of mostof the assessed genes was significantly affected by treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GF677 showed more molecular and transcriptomic changes than Adesoto.

Material
GF677 rootstocke0
Outcome
changes at the molecular and transcriptomic levele0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Adesoto rootstocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding genotypes,GF677 rootstock showed more changes at the molecular and transcriptomic level thandid Adesoto rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological status and transcriptomic responses shifted together.

Outcome
physiological statusand the transcriptomic responsese0
Qualifier
coordinated shifte0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A coordinated shift was found between the physiological statusand the transcriptomic responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–123 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.