Paper · 2020 · Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Growth and Physiological Responses of Sugarcane to Drought Stress at an Early Growth Stage

Bui The Khuynh; Vu Ngoc Thang; Vu Dinh Chinh; et al.

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in a net house to evaluate the effects of drought stress (a 20-day water withholding treatment from 100-120 days after planting) on the growth and physiology of five sugarcane cultivars. The results showed that water stress at an early stage significantly affected sugarcane growth and physiology. Water stress resulted in reductions in plant height, stalk diameter, and leaf number of sugarcane, in addition to reductions in the photosynthetic pigment content, Fv/Fm, and SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) readings after the 20-day withholding water period (120 DAP), and in stem, root, and leaf fresh weights, and leaf area at 150 DAP. Besides, drought stress led to increases in stomata density and decreases in stomata length. Variation was also found among the cultivars in response to water stress. Significant genotypic differences in stem fresh weight and leaf area under water stress among the cultivars were observed. The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g). However, the highest DTI was recorded in ROC16, followed by VL06, ROC10, QĐ93-159, and ROC22, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane plant height, stalk diameter, and leaf number.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
Water stresse1
Outcome
plant height, stalk diameter, and leaf numbere1
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water stress resulted in reductions in plant height, stalk diameter, and leaf number of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane photosynthetic pigment content, Fv/Fm, and SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) readings.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment content, Fv/Fm, and SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) readingse1
Direction
reductionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“reductions in the photosynthetic pigment content, Fv/Fm, and SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) readings after the 20-day withholding water period (120 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–603 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress led to increases in stomata density and decreases in stomata length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane stem, root, and leaf fresh weights.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
stem, root, and leaf fresh weightse1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“in stem, root, and leaf fresh weights, and leaf area at 150 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress led to increases in stomata density and decreases in stomata length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane leaf area.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“in stem, root, and leaf fresh weights, and leaf area at 150 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–672 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress led to increases in stomata density and decreases in stomata length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane stomata density.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
stomata densitye1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress led to increases in stomata density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed sugarcane stomata length.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
stomata lengthe1
Direction
decreasese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreases in stomata length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–765 · show in text ↑
e2

“drought stress led to increases in stomata density and decreases in stomata length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane cultivars differed significantly in stem fresh weight and leaf area under water stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
stem fresh weight and leaf areae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant genotypic differences in stem fresh weight and leaf area under water stress among the cultivars were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–963 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROC22 had stem fresh weight 50.6 g under stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
ROC22e0
Outcome
stem fresh weighte0
Value
50.6 ge0
Qualifier
stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

QĐ159 had stem fresh weight 46.5g under stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
QĐ159e0
Outcome
stem fresh weighte0
Value
46.5ge0
Qualifier
stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROC16 had stem fresh weight 46.2g under stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
ROC16e0
Outcome
stem fresh weighte0
Value
46.2ge0
Qualifier
stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROC10 had stem fresh weight 46.1g under stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
ROC10e0
Outcome
stem fresh weighte0
Value
46.1ge0
Qualifier
stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL06 had stem fresh weight 44.4g under stress.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
VL06e0
Outcome
stem fresh weighte0
Value
44.4ge0
Qualifier
stressed conditionse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest value of stem fresh weight under stressed conditions was recorded in ROC22 (50.6 g), followed by QĐ159 (46.5g), ROC16 (46.2g), ROC10 (46.1g), and VL06 (44.4g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1135 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ROC16 had the highest DTI among the tested cultivars.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
ROC16e0
Outcome
DTIe0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest DTI was recorded in ROC16, followed by VL06, ROC10, QĐ93-159, and ROC22, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1243 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 4 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

drought · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.