Paper · 2020 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effects of Nitrogen and Sulphur Fertilization on the Production and Nutritive Values of Two Elephant Grass Cultivars at Two Different Harvesting Times

M M Fauzi; H Soetanto; Mashudi

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A laboratory experiment was carried out to ascertain the effects of adding nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) fertilizers on the nutritive values of two elephant grass cultivars, that is Pennisetum purpureum cv. Taiwan (EGT) and Mott (EGM) at 45 and 60 days harvesting times. Three levels of N fertilizer equivalent to,0, 500, and 1000 kg/Ha/year and two combination of N + S fertilizers equivalent to 500 kg N+571 kg S;1000 kg N+1143 kg S/Ha/year, respectively were allotted into a nested complete randomized design with three replicates each. Approximately 10 kg of soil was placed in each poly bag + one clump of grass and the sward was allowed to grow for 90 days, trimmed and harvested at their respective times. The results showed that the use of fertilizers particularly nitrogen linearly increased the nutrition content of grass and the dose of 1000 kg N+1143 kg S/Ha/year resulted in the highest CP content regardless of the harvesting times. EGM may offer more digestible nutrients than EGT due to superiority in the leaf: stem ratio than EGM. In conclusion EGM can be recommended to replace EGT for ruminant forage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers, particularly nitrogen, linearly increased elephant grass nutrition content.

Taxon
Elephant GrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
fertilizers particularly nitrogene0
Outcome
nutrition contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of fertilizers particularly nitrogen linearly increased the nutrition content of grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Elephant Grass Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1000 kg N+1143 kg S/Ha/year dose gave the highest elephant grass CP content regardless of harvest timing.

Taxon
Elephant GrassCenchrus purpureust0
Treatment
1000 kg N+1143 kg S/Ha/yeare0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
regardless of the harvesting timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dose of 1000 kg N+1143 kg S/Ha/year resulted in the highest CP content regardless of the harvesting times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Elephant Grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mott elephant grass may offer more digestible nutrients than Taiwan elephant grass.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse1
Material
Motte1
Outcome
digestible nutrientse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
maye0
Comparator
Taiwane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EGM may offer more digestible nutrients than EGT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pennisetum purpureum cv. Taiwan (EGT) and Mott (EGM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mott elephant grass had a superior leaf: stem ratio compared with Taiwan.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse1
Material
Motte1
Outcome
leaf: stem ratioe0
Direction
superioritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superiority in the leaf: stem ratio than EGM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pennisetum purpureum cv. Taiwan (EGT) and Mott (EGM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–242 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Mott over Taiwan for ruminant forage.

Taxon
Pennisetum purpureumCenchrus purpureuse1
Material
Motte1
Outcome
replace EGT for ruminant foragee0
Comparator
Taiwane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus purpureus
Cenchrus purpureus · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EGM can be recommended to replace EGT for ruminant forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pennisetum purpureum cv. Taiwan (EGT) and Mott (EGM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–242 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus purpureus (elephant grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.