Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

The Use of Proline in Screening for Tolerance to Drought and Salinity in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes

Sugenith Arteaga; Lourdes Yabor; María José Díez; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
105
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The selection of stress-resistant cultivars, to be used in breeding programmes aimed at enhancing the drought and salt tolerance of our major crops, is an urgent need for agriculture in a climate change scenario. In the present study, the responses to water deficit and salt stress treatments, regarding growth inhibition and leaf proline (Pro) contents, were analysed in 47 Phaseolus vulgaris genotypes of different origins. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson moment correlations and principal component analyses (PCAs) were performed on all measured traits, to assess the general responses to stress of the investigated genotypes. For most analysed growth variables and Pro, the effects of cultivar, treatment and their interactions were highly significant (p < 0.001); the root morphological traits, stem diameter and the number of leaves were mostly due to uncontrolled variation, whereas the variation of fresh weight and water content of stems and leaves was clearly induced by stress. Under our experimental conditions, the average effects of salt stress on plant growth were relatively weaker than those of water deficit. In both cases, however, growth inhibition was mostly reflected in the stress-induced reduction of fresh weight and water contents of stems and leaves. Pro, on the other hand, was the only variable showing a negative correlation with all growth parameters, but particularly with those of stems and leaves mentioned above, as indicated by the Pearson correlation coefficients and the loading plots of the PCAs. Therefore, in common beans, higher stress-induced accumulation of Pro is unequivocally associated with a stronger inhibition of growth; that is, with a higher sensitivity to stress of the corresponding cultivar. We propose the use of Pro as a suitable biochemical marker for simple, rapid, large-scale screenings of bean genotypes, to exclude the most sensitive, those accumulating higher Pro concentrations in response to water or salt stress treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, treatment, and their interactions significantly affected most growth variables and proline.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
most analysed growth variables and Proe0
Qualifier
cultivar, treatment and their interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For most analysed growth variables and Pro, the effects of cultivar, treatment and their interactions were highly significant (p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root morphological traits, stem diameter and leaf number varied mostly for uncontrolled reasons.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
root morphological traits, stem diameter and the number of leavese0
Qualifier
uncontrolled variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root morphological traits, stem diameter and the number of leaves were mostly due to uncontrolled variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress clearly induced variation in stem and leaf fresh weight and water content.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
fresh weight and water content of stems and leavese0
Qualifier
stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variation of fresh weight and water content of stems and leaves was clearly induced by stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress inhibited growth less than water deficit under the experimental conditions.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
relatively weakere0
Comparator
water deficite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under our experimental conditions, the average effects of salt stress on plant growth were relatively weaker than those of water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced stem and leaf fresh weight and water content.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
fresh weight and water contents of stems and leavese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth inhibition was mostly reflected in the stress-induced reduction of fresh weight and water contents of stems and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline correlated negatively with all growth parameters, especially stem and leaf measures.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Compound
Proe0
Outcome
all growth parameterse0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Qualifier
particularly with those of stems and leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pro, on the other hand, was the only variable showing a negative correlation with all growth parameters, but particularly with those of stems and leaves mentioned above”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher stress-induced proline accumulation was associated with stronger growth inhibition and stress sensitivity.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Compound
Proe0
Outcome
inhibition of growthe0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
higher sensitivity to stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher stress-induced accumulation of Pro is unequivocally associated with a stronger inhibition of growth; that is, with a higher sensitivity to stress of the corresponding cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose proline for screening out the most stress-sensitive bean genotypes.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
use of Pro as a suitable biochemical marker for simple, rapid, large-scale screenings of bean genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We propose the use of Pro as a suitable biochemical marker for simple, rapid, large-scale screenings of bean genotypes, to exclude the most sensitive, those accumulating higher Pro concentrations in response to water or salt stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–2006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

71 papers: 7 positive, 64 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.