Paper · 2007 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Physiological response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings to salinity stress

Gama; Inanaga; Tanaka; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
134
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of salinity stress on five cultivars of common bean: Bassbeer, Beladi, Giza 3, HRS 516 and RO21 were evaluated on a sand/peat medium with different salinity levels (0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl) applied 3 weeks after germination for duration of 10 days. Salinity had adverse effects not only on the biomass yield and relative growth rate (RGRt), but also on other morphological parameters such as plant height, number of leaves, root length and shoot/root weight ratio. Photosynthesis, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were adversely affected in all cultivars. Leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgor varied significantly among cultivars and salt levels. The interaction between cultivars and salt levels for photosynthesis, leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgor was highly significant at day 10 of salt treatment. The Na uptake among the cultivars varied in the order: HRS 516 <RO21 <Giza 3 <Bassbeer <Beladi. This suggests that HRS 516 was most tolerant cultivar because it was the only cultivar with the highest survival rate and no symptoms of salt stress. RO21 was the most susceptible to salinity as it showed severe symptoms of salt stress and very low survival rate. Key words: Salinity stress, Na+ ions, physiology, photosynthesis, water relations, common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected biomass yield and relative growth rate.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
biomass yield and relative growth rate (RGRt)e0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity had adverse effects not only on the biomass yield and relative growth rate (RGRt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected plant height, leaf number, root length and shoot to root weight ratio.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, root length and shoot/root weight ratioe0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity had adverse effects not only on the biomass yield and relative growth rate (RGRt), but also on other morphological parameters such as plant height, number of leaves, root length and shoot/root weight ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance were adversely affected in all cultivars.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
Photosynthesis, transpiration rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were adversely affected in all cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf osmotic potential and turgor varied significantly across cultivars and salt levels.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
salt levelse0
Outcome
Leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgor varied significantly among cultivars and salt levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and salt level interactions were highly significant for photosynthesis, leaf osmotic potential and turgor at day 10.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
cultivarse0
Treatment
salt levelse0
Outcome
photosynthesis, leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgore0
Qualifier
day 10 of salt treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between cultivars and salt levels for photosynthesis, leaf osmotic potential and leaf turgor was highly significant at day 10 of salt treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium uptake increased across cultivars in the order HRS 516, RO21, Giza 3, Bassbeer and Beladi.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
Na uptakee0
Direction
variede0
Qualifier
HRS 516 <RO21 <Giza 3 <Bassbeer <Beladie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Na uptake among the cultivars varied in the order: HRS 516 <RO21 <Giza 3 <Bassbeer <Beladi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HRS 516 was judged the most salt tolerant cultivar, with highest survival and no salt stress symptoms.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
HRS 516e0
Outcome
highest survival rate and no symptoms of salt stresse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HRS 516 was most tolerant cultivar because it was the only cultivar with the highest survival rate and no symptoms of salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RO21 was the most salt susceptible cultivar, with severe symptoms and very low survival.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
RO21e0
Outcome
severe symptoms of salt stress and very low survival ratee0
Direction
very lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RO21 was the most susceptible to salinity as it showed severe symptoms of salt stress and very low survival rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–61 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

71 papers: 7 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.