Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Cattle Slurry on the Growth of Spinach Plants in Cd-contaminated Soil

Filipa R. Pinto; Miguel P. Mourato; Joana R. Sales; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In this work the effect of the addition of different amounts of cattle slurry (CS) to a Cd contaminated soil, was studied regarding its effect in spinach plants. Two levels of Cd contamination (2 and 10 mg/kg) and three levels of CS addition were evaluated (2.5, 5 and 10 g CS/100 g soil). Spinach was shown to be a tolerant species, able to accumulate relatively high amounts of Cd (up to 367.7 mg/kg in the leaves), exceeding the limits established by European regulations for leaf vegetables. The addition of 2.5 and 5 g CS/100 g to soil containing 2 mg/kg Cd did not reduce the uptake of this metal but allowed the plants to grow as much as the control. The addition of 10 g CS/100 g lead to a reduced Cd uptake but also to a lower plant growth compared to the lower CS levels. The combined effects of Cd and CS changed element content in the plant, but without causing severe toxicity or deficiency effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach accumulated relatively high amounts of Cd in its leaves (up to 367.7 mg/kg) and was a tolerant species.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
accumulate relatively high amounts of Cde1
Value
up to 367.7 mg/kge1
Qualifier
tolerant speciese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spinach was shown to be a tolerant species, able to accumulate relatively high amounts of Cd (up to 367.7 mg/kg in the leaves), exceeding the limits established by European regulations for leaf vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach leaf Cd exceeded the limits established by European regulations for leaf vegetables.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
exceeding the limits established by European regulations for leaf vegetablese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spinach was shown to be a tolerant species, able to accumulate relatively high amounts of Cd (up to 367.7 mg/kg in the leaves), exceeding the limits established by European regulations for leaf vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2.5 and 5 g CS/100 g to soil with 2 mg/kg Cd did not reduce Cd uptake by spinach.

Treatment
2.5 and 5 g CS/100 ge2
Outcome
uptake of this metale2
Direction
did not reducee2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of 2.5 and 5 g CS/100 g to soil containing 2 mg/kg Cd did not reduce the uptake of this metal but allowed the plants to grow as much as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 2.5 and 5 g CS/100 g to soil with 2 mg/kg Cd allowed spinach to grow as much as the control.

Treatment
2.5 and 5 g CS/100 ge2
Outcome
growe2
Direction
as much ase2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The addition of 2.5 and 5 g CS/100 g to soil containing 2 mg/kg Cd did not reduce the uptake of this metal but allowed the plants to grow as much as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10 g CS/100 g reduced Cd uptake by spinach.

Treatment
10 g CS/100 ge3
Outcome
Cd uptakee3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of 10 g CS/100 g lead to a reduced Cd uptake but also to a lower plant growth compared to the lower CS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 10 g CS/100 g lowered spinach plant growth compared with the lower CS levels.

Treatment
10 g CS/100 ge3
Outcome
plant growthe3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
lower CS levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of 10 g CS/100 g lead to a reduced Cd uptake but also to a lower plant growth compared to the lower CS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined effects of Cd and cattle slurry changed element content in spinach without severe toxicity or deficiency effects.

Treatment
combined effects of Cd and CSe4
Outcome
element content in the plante4
Direction
changede4
Qualifier
without causing severe toxicity or deficiency effectse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth of Spinach Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–55 · show in text ↑
e4

“The combined effects of Cd and CS changed element content in the plant, but without causing severe toxicity or deficiency effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–911 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 53 positive, 7 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

fertilization · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.