Paper · 2016 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

EFFECT OF SEASONAL TILLAGE ON SOME SOIL PROPERTIES, ENERGY PARAMETERS AND PRODUCTIVITY UNDER RECLAIMED SOIL

M. M. I. Khater

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was focusing on energy parameters for tillage conditions of New El Salhia region, where dryland conditions were occurred. Soil texture was sandy loam. The methodology used in the calculation of consumed energy was divided into inputs and outputs to identify the energy ratio. Data from field experiment were used to determine some soil physical properties, energy indices and yield of wheat and corn as affected by tillage treatments. Tillage treatments included conventional system (chiselhing twice and harrowing), Minimum tillage (chiselling) and another minimum tillage system (harrowing). The soil bulk density and moisture content was determined for two depth until 30 cm. From the above mentioned it can be concluded that the minimum tillage using chisel plow might be necessary to conserve the moisture content and improve soil structure which consequently gave profitable yield from the energy point of view. The results showed that the conventional tillage treatments had the highest grain and biomass yield while harrowing treatments had the lowest values. The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively. The latter results mean that conventional tillage treatments were recommended for dryland farming of wheat and corn in El Salhia region. These results also will be helpful in developing a comprehensive database on the energy parameters of tillage implements for Egyptian agricultural machinery management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had the highest grain and biomass yields.

Treatment
conventional tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
harrowing treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the conventional tillage treatments had the highest grain and biomass yield while harrowing treatments had the lowest values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrowing had the lowest grain and biomass yields.

Treatment
harrowing treatmentse0
Outcome
grain and biomass yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
conventional tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the conventional tillage treatments had the highest grain and biomass yield while harrowing treatments had the lowest values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave wheat the greatest net energy gain of 52.34 GJ.

Treatment
conventional tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
net energy gaine0
Direction
moste0
Value
52.34 and 163.85 GJe0
Comparator
harrowing treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave corn the greatest net energy gain of 163.85 GJ.

Treatment
conventional tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
net energy gaine0
Direction
moste0
Value
163.85 GJe0
Comparator
harrowing treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrowing gave wheat the least net energy gain of 47.46 GJ.

Treatment
harrowing treatmentse0
Outcome
net energy gaine0
Direction
leaste0
Value
47.46 and 156.61 GJe0
Comparator
conventional tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrowing gave corn the least net energy gain of 156.61 GJ.

Treatment
harrowing treatmentse0
Outcome
net energy gaine0
Direction
leaste0
Value
156.61 GJe0
Comparator
conventional tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conventional tillage treatments gave the most net energy gain of (52.34 and 163.85 GJ) meanwhile the harrowing treatments gave the least ones (47.46 and 156.61 GJ) for wheat and corn respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1279 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conventional tillage for dryland wheat and corn production in El Salhia.

Outcome
conventional tillage treatmentse0
Setting
El Salhia regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage treatments were recommended for dryland farming of wheat and corn in El Salhia region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1416 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.