Paper · 2014 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

MANAGEMENT OF SURFACE IRRIGATION ON WHEAT YIELD IN OLD VALLEY

M. Y. Bondok; A. F. EL- Sharkawey

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Gemmeiza Agric. Res. Station during winter (2012/2013 and 2013/ 2014) seasons to study the effect of three irrigation intervals (every 30, 40 and 50 days), farmyard manure (with and without farmyard manure) and three nitrogen fertilizer levels (40, 60 and 80 kg N/ fed) on wheat yield, yield components and water use efficiency of wheat. A split – split plot design with three replication was used. The most important results could be summarized as followed. Due to irrigation every 30 days the plant height, straw yield (ton /fed), spike height .No. of grains /spike and grain yield (Mg /fed) were increased. the water use efficiency was decreased .Using farmyard manure increase the plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency compared to without farmyard manure .By increasing fertilization N levels increase both plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency were increased .Interactions between irrigation interval 30 days , with farmyard manure and fertilization level 80 kg N/fed. could be recommended to obtain the best results of wheat yield .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days increased height, straw yield and spike height.

Treatment
irrigation every 30 dayse0
Outcome
plant height, straw yield (ton /fed), spike heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to irrigation every 30 days the plant height, straw yield (ton /fed), spike height .No. of grains /spike and grain yield (Mg /fed) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days increased grains per spike and grain yield.

Treatment
irrigation every 30 dayse0
Outcome
No. of grains /spike and grain yield (Mg /fed)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to irrigation every 30 days the plant height, straw yield (ton /fed), spike height .No. of grains /spike and grain yield (Mg /fed) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days decreased water use efficiency.

Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the water use efficiency was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure increased height, straw yield and spike height.

Treatment
farmyard manuree0
Outcome
plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
without farmyard manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using farmyard manure increase the plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency compared to without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure increased grains per spike, grain yield and water use efficiency.

Treatment
farmyard manuree0
Outcome
No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
without farmyard manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using farmyard manure increase the plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency compared to without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization increased plant height, straw yield and spike height.

Treatment
increasing fertilization N levelse0
Outcome
plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By increasing fertilization N levels increase both plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization increased grains per spike, grain yield and water use efficiency.

Treatment
increasing fertilization N levelse0
Outcome
No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By increasing fertilization N levels increase both plant height, straw yield ( ton/fed ) ,spike height .No. of grains /spike , grain yield (Mg /fed) and water use efficiency were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every 30 days with manure and 80 kg N/fed was recommended for best wheat yield.

Outcome
irrigation interval 30 days , with farmyard manure and fertilization level 80 kg N/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactions between irrigation interval 30 days , with farmyard manure and fertilization level 80 kg N/fed. could be recommended to obtain the best results of wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–41 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.