Paper · 2020 · The Korean Tea Society

Comparison of Tea Tree (Camellia sinensis L.) Growth and Weed Occurrences by a Green Manure Crop

Doobo Shim; Jung Gyu Hwang; Mi Jin Kwon; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

본 연구는 친환경 차나무 재배에서 월동 풋거름작물 재배시 차나무의 생육특성 및 잡초발생에 미치는 영향을 알아보고, 차나무 관리에 유용한 초종을 선발하기 위한 기초적 자료를 얻기 위하여 수행하였다. 무처리의경우 13종의 잡초 229주, 생체중 4,344 g (건물중 745 g)이 조사되었으며, 크림슨클로버 처리에서 가장 적은 3.7 종의 잡초 14.7주, 생체중 18.0 g (건물중 1.1 g) 조사되었으며, 모든 풋거름작물 처리구에서 98% 이상 잡초방제효과가 있었다. 토양유기물 함량은 무처리 14.1 g/kg으로 가장 낮았으며, 크림슨클로버 처리에서 가장 많은 2.2 배 증가한 30.5 g/kg 함량을 보였다. 차나무 생엽의 엽록소함량은 무처리 38.1, 들묵새 처리 38.3, 자운영 처리40.1, 크림슨클로버 처리 41.9로 조사되었으며, 엽록소형광에서도 크림슨클로버 처리 0.804 Fv/Fm로 가장 높았다. 잡초억제, 토양개선효과, 차나무 생육 등을 고려하였을 때, 차나무의 풋거름작물로 크림슨클로버가 가장 적합한 것으로 사료된다.This study examined the effects of green manure on the growth characteristics and weed control for tea trees in organic tea cultivation. The weed control, soil chemistry, SPAD value, and chlorophyll fluorescence were examined with five different treatments [Festuca myuros (FES), Astragalus sinicus (AST), Trifolium incarnatum (TRI), mixing sowing (Astragalus sinicus 1 + Trifolium incarnatum 2) and control]. The weed occurrence was 229 weeds of 13 flora (fresh weight 4,344 g, dry weight 745 g) in control; TRI treatment was the lowest, 14.7 weeds of 3.7 flora (fresh weight 18.0 g, dry weight 1.1 g). The mulching treatment groups showed a weed inhibition effect compared to the control (over 98%). Organic matter was lowest at 14.1 g/kg, but highest at 30.5 g/kg (2.2 times) in the TRI treatment. SPAD value and chlorophyll fluorescence of tea leaves were also highest in the TRI treatment (38.1, 41.9 Fv/Fm). Therefore, Trifolium incarnatum is considered the most effective when considering weed control, soil chemical properties, growth of tea trees, and convenience of work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment had the lowest weed weeds (14.7 weeds).

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
14.7 weedse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weed occurrence was 229 weeds of 13 flora (fresh weight 4,344 g, dry weight 745 g) in control; TRI treatment was the lowest, 14.7 weeds of 3.7 flora (fresh weight 18.0 g, dry weight 1.1 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment had the lowest weed flora (3.7 flora).

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
florae0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.7 florae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weed occurrence was 229 weeds of 13 flora (fresh weight 4,344 g, dry weight 745 g) in control; TRI treatment was the lowest, 14.7 weeds of 3.7 flora (fresh weight 18.0 g, dry weight 1.1 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment had the lowest weed fresh weight (18.0 g).

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
18.0 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weed occurrence was 229 weeds of 13 flora (fresh weight 4,344 g, dry weight 745 g) in control; TRI treatment was the lowest, 14.7 weeds of 3.7 flora (fresh weight 18.0 g, dry weight 1.1 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment had the lowest weed dry weight (1.1 g).

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.1 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The weed occurrence was 229 weeds of 13 flora (fresh weight 4,344 g, dry weight 745 g) in control; TRI treatment was the lowest, 14.7 weeds of 3.7 flora (fresh weight 18.0 g, dry weight 1.1 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching treatments inhibited weeds by over 98% relative to control.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
mulching treatment groupse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed inhibition effecte0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
over 98%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mulching treatment groups showed a weed inhibition effect compared to the control (over 98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment gave the highest soil organic matter at 30.5 g/kg.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Outcome
Organic mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.5 g/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Organic matter was lowest at 14.1 g/kg, but highest at 30.5 g/kg (2.2 times) in the TRI treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment produced the highest SPAD value in tea leaves.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Organ / stage
tea leavese0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Outcome
SPAD valuee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“SPAD value and chlorophyll fluorescence of tea leaves were also highest in the TRI treatment (38.1, 41.9 Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRI treatment produced the highest chlorophyll fluorescence of tea leaves.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Organ / stage
tea leavese0
Treatment
TRI treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence of tea leavese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“SPAD value and chlorophyll fluorescence of tea leaves were also highest in the TRI treatment (38.1, 41.9 Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1442 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Trifolium incarnatum the most effective green manure for tea cultivation.

Taxon
Camellia sinensis L.Camellia sinensist0
Treatment
Trifolium incarnatume0
Outcome
Trifolium incarnatum is considered the most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Therefore, Trifolium incarnatum is considered the most effective when considering weed control, soil chemical properties, growth of tea trees, and convenience of work.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1611 · show in text ↑

mulching · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.