Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu agricultural university, Coimbatore during kharif and rabi 2011-12 and 2012-13 to find out the effect of different sources of nutrients on NPK uptake by rice at different growth stages. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design in kharif and rabi season with fourteen treatments and three replications. The treatments consists of T6 50% as Sesbania aculeata + 50% as inorganic fertilizer maximum NPK uptake by rice in different growth stages. However, it was on par with that of 50% N through FYM + 50% N as inorganic fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 1
Claim · model-written summary
The 50% Sesbania aculeata and 50% inorganic fertilizer treatment gave maximum NPK uptake by rice at different growth stages, on par with the FYM and inorganic fertilizer treatment.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Organ / stage
- different growth stagese0
- Treatment
- T6 50% as Sesbania aculeata + 50% as inorganic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- NPK uptakee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- 50% N through FYM + 50% N as inorganic fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T6 50% as Sesbania aculeata + 50% as inorganic fertilizer maximum NPK uptake by rice in different growth stages. However, it was on par with that of 50% N through FYM + 50% N as inorganic fertilizer.”
The same questions in other papers
Sesbania bispinosa · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.