Paper · 2020 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Cracking and breaking response in four rice varieties as influenced by fertilization regime and storage duration

Kwasi Owusu Robert; Sugri Issah; Dogbe Wilson; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In Northern Ghana, harvesting of the bulk of paddy, which is cultivated under rain-fed conditions, coincides with the harmattan season. This season is characterized by low relative humidity and dry weather conditions which hasten drying and increase the tendency of the paddy to crack during milling. The farmers also store paddy for longer periods in anticipation of higher price in the open market, thus the paddy may deteriorate as a result of fluctuations in seasonal temperature and relative humidity. This study assessed the effects of fertilizer application regimes and storage duration on cracking and breaking during milling in 4 aromatic rice varieties. Across the varieties, grains that showed signs of cracks will eventually break during milling, and grain susceptibility to cracking significantly (P<0.05) increased when stored beyond 30 days. Gbewaa rice recorded significantly (P<0.05) higher cracking (49.2%) followed by Amankwatia (43.9%), CSIR-AGRA (40.4%) and Exbaika (40.3%). Fertilization regime of 2 basal applications and 2 topdressings at panicle initiation and booting-heading stages resulted in grains that were well-filled and thick to resist drying and cracking. Key words: Aromatic varieties, nitrogen fertilizer, straight-milling, paddy cracking, consumer taste.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cracked grains eventually broke during milling across the rice varieties.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
break during millinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across the varieties, grains that showed signs of cracks will eventually break during milling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage beyond 30 days significantly increased grain susceptibility to cracking.

Treatment
stored beyond 30 dayse0
Outcome
grain susceptibility to crackinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain susceptibility to cracking significantly (P<0.05) increased when stored beyond 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gbewaa rice had the highest reported cracking at 49.2%.

Material
Gbewaae0
Outcome
crackinge0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gbewaa rice recorded significantly (P<0.05) higher cracking (49.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amankwatia rice had 43.9% cracking.

Material
Amankwatiae0
Outcome
crackinge1
Value
43.9%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amankwatia (43.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSIR-AGRA rice had 40.4% cracking.

Material
CSIR-AGRAe0
Outcome
crackinge1
Value
40.4%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CSIR-AGRA (40.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exbaika rice had 40.3% cracking.

Material
Exbaikae0
Outcome
crackinge1
Value
40.3%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exbaika (40.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two basal fertilizer applications and two topdressings produced well-filled, thick grains resistant to drying and cracking.

Treatment
2 basal applications and 2 topdressings at panicle initiation and booting-heading stagese0
Outcome
grains that were well-filled and thick to resist drying and crackinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization regime of 2 basal applications and 2 topdressings at panicle initiation and booting-heading stages resulted in grains that were well-filled and thick to resist drying and cracking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.