Paper · 2020 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Light irradiation affects the total antioxidant capacity, total phenolic compounds, phenolic acids, and related enzyme activities of minimally processed spinach (Spinacia oleraceaL.)

Lijuan Zhan; Jingyao Li; Wen Huang; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of continuous light irradiation (30 μmol m2 s−1) on the total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total phenolic compounds (TPC), phenolic acids, and their related enzyme activities in minimally processed spinach during 7 days of storage at 7°C. Compared with darkness, light irradiation induced a 68.57% increase in TPC by activating phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity by 68.07% and inhibiting polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activities by 36.69% and 10.77%, respectively, after 7 days of storage. The increase in TPC might be attributed to the de novo synthesis of eight phenolic acids, because they were positively correlated (R = 0.895, p < .01). Both TPC and phenolic acids significantly contributed to TAC values that were notably improved by light irradiation during storage. In addition, light irradiation alleviated spinach chlorophyll deterioration, however it accelerated fresh weight loss by increasing stomatal conductance during storage. Practical applications Spinach is a leafy vegetable favored by consumers for its attractive sensory quality and health-promoting compounds. The quality and shelf life of fresh spinach are influenced by not only initial quality at harvest but also postharvest factors during the subsequent supply chain. Light irradiation, an unavoidable factor during the supply chain, significantly regulates the postharvest quality and senescence of fresh products. This study clearly demonstrated that continuous light irradiation could improve minimally processed spinach nutritional quality by inducing increases in total antioxidant capacity, total phenolic compounds, and de novo synthesis of phenolic acids after 7 days of storage. In addition, light irradiation alleviated spinach chlorophyll deterioration. These original and innovative findings are expected to provide valuable information to processors and sellers to capture a larger market share and earn maximum profit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased spinach total phenolic compounds by 68.57% after seven days versus darkness.

Treatment
light irradiatione0
Outcome
TPCe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
68.57%e0
Qualifier
after 7 days of storagee0
Comparator
darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with darkness, light irradiation induced a 68.57% increase in TPC by activating phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity by 68.07% and inhibiting polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activities by 36.69% and 10.77%, respectively, after 7 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light raised spinach phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity by 68.07%.

Treatment
light irradiatione0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)e0
Outcome
phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activitye0
Direction
activatinge0
Value
68.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light irradiation induced a 68.57% increase in TPC by activating phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity by 68.07%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light inhibited spinach polyphenol oxidase activity by 36.69%.

Gene
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
36.69%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibiting polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activities by 36.69% and 10.77%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light inhibited spinach peroxidase activity by 10.77%.

Gene
peroxidase (POD)e0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) activitiese0
Direction
inhibitinge0
Value
10.77%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibiting polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) activities by 36.69% and 10.77%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased spinach TPC was positively correlated with de novo synthesis of eight phenolic acids.

Compound
phenolic acidse0
Outcome
TPCe0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
R = 0.895e0
Qualifier
p < .01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in TPC might be attributed to the de novo synthesis of eight phenolic acids, because they were positively correlated (R = 0.895, p < .01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–699 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TPC contributed significantly to spinach total antioxidant capacity.

Compound
TPCe0
Outcome
TAC valuese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TPC and phenolic acids significantly contributed to TAC values that were notably improved by light irradiation during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic acids contributed significantly to spinach total antioxidant capacity.

Compound
phenolic acidse0
Outcome
TAC valuese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TPC and phenolic acids significantly contributed to TAC values that were notably improved by light irradiation during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light notably improved spinach total antioxidant capacity during storage.

Treatment
light irradiatione0
Outcome
TAC valuese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TAC values that were notably improved by light irradiation during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light accelerated spinach fresh weight loss during storage.

Treatment
light irradiatione0
Outcome
fresh weight losse0
Direction
acceleratede0
Qualifier
increasing stomatal conductancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light irradiation alleviated spinach chlorophyll deterioration, however it accelerated fresh weight loss by increasing stomatal conductance during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased spinach stomatal conductance during storage.

Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it accelerated fresh weight loss by increasing stomatal conductance during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–160 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.