Intervention effectmodel-written summary

LED treatment maintained color better than dark storage.

A claim from Optimizing Spinach Shelf Life and Nutritional Quality Using Targeted LED Light Treatments · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LED treatment maintained color better than dark storage.

Treatment
LED‐treated samplese0
Outcome
colore0
Direction
better maintainede0
Comparator
Dark storagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark storage caused the greatest color change (Δ E = 7.30), whereas LED‐treated samples better maintained color ( p < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–704
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18

Title

Optimizing Spinach Shelf Life and Nutritional Quality Using Targeted LED Light Treatments

Shafieh Salehinia; Sarah MacPherson; Kam Hammad; et al. Journal of Food Science 2026. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.71171

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e635248875ff6aa416135f58b7de6235d29a9f48c9f3feea159e28ef979b1492 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

light · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.