Paper · 2020 · Biologia Plantarum

A rapid translocation of photoassimilates from source organs maintains grain yield in cowpea subjected to drought stress during grain filling

C. EGASHIRA; Y. HASHIGUCHI; E. KURAUCHI; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

We examined the influence of drought stress during grain filling on grain yield to investigate changes in assimilates in sink and source organs. When plants were subjected to drought stress from the start of grain filling until harvest, the photosynthetic rate rapidly decreased. Grain dry mass during maturation was not significantly different between the control and drought-stressed plants. Under drought stress conditions, starch content in source organs (peduncle, leaf, petiole, stem, and root) was significantly lower than in corresponding organs of control plants; the greatest difference was seen in leaves. Consistent with this observation, α- and β-amylase activities in leaves significantly increased within the first 6 d of drought stress. We conclude that in cowpea subjected to drought stress during grain filling, the grain yield is maintained, despite a dramatic decrease in photosynthetic rate, by translocation of photoassimilates from source organs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought from the start of grain filling until harvest rapidly decreased photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
from the start of grain filling until harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plants were subjected to drought stress from the start of grain filling until harvest, the photosynthetic rate rapidly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain dry mass during maturation did not differ significantly between drought and control plants.

Organ / stage
during maturatione0
Treatment
drought-stressede0
Outcome
Grain dry masse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain dry mass during maturation was not significantly different between the control and drought-stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly lowered starch content across source organs compared with corresponding control organs, with the largest difference in leaves.

Organ / stage
source organse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
the greatest difference was seen in leavese0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress conditions, starch content in source organs (peduncle, leaf, petiole, stem, and root) was significantly lower than in corresponding organs of control plants; the greatest difference was seen in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf α-amylase activity increased significantly within six days of drought.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
α- and β-amylase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
within the first 6 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“α- and β-amylase activities in leaves significantly increased within the first 6 d of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that photoassimilate translocation from source organs maintained cowpea grain yield under drought.

Organ / stage
source organse0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
grain yield is maintainede0
Qualifier
by translocation of photoassimilates from source organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cowpea subjected to drought stress during grain filling, the grain yield is maintained, despite a dramatic decrease in photosynthetic rate, by translocation of photoassimilates from source organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–968 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

17 papers: 2 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

drought · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

52 papers: 9 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.