Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field

Anil Kumar Singh; YC Rikhari; Rajeev Chauhan; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To formulate a realistic sustainable management module for brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) a field experiment was carried out during kharif seasons of 2016-17 and 2017-18 in the farmers’ fields at Imalia and Kakraua villages of Datia district in Bundel Khand zone. The combination of three components i.e. pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and application of Carbosulfan 25 EC @ 1000ml/ha at 20 days interval after 20 days of planting (M5) was found most effective in reduction of shoot damage (76.59%) and fruit damage (81.44%) followed by M6 (6 times pesticide sprays), M4 (Trap + Two spray of insecticide), M3 (Sex pheromone Trap + M1), M1 (Sanitation + Mechanical removal of shoot and fruits), M2 (Only installation of trap). Highest mean yield of Brinjal per field was recorded in M5 (227.00 q/ha) which is 30.63 per cent more than untreated field followed by M6, M4, M3, M1 and M2. IPM combination M5 provided the highest gross returns (Rs. 181840/ha) and highest net return Rs. 135790/ha. The highest benefit cost ratio of 4.19 was obtained from M4 followed by M5, M2, M6, M3 and M1. However, benefit cost ratio was found in M5 is statistically on par with M2 and M6 similarly, another combination M6 statistically at par with M2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and Carbosulfan application reduced brinjal shoot damage by 76.59%.

Treatment
pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and application of Carbosulfan 25 EC @ 1000ml/hae1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
shoot damagee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
76.59%e1
Setting
Datia district in Bundel Khand zonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was carried out during kharif seasons of 2016-17 and 2017-18 in the farmers’ fields at Imalia and Kakraua villages of Datia district in Bundel Khand zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of three components i.e. pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and application of Carbosulfan 25 EC @ 1000ml/ha at 20 days interval after 20 days of planting (M5) was found most effective in reduction of shoot damage (76.59%) and fruit damage (81.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and Carbosulfan application reduced brinjal fruit damage by 81.44%.

Treatment
pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and application of Carbosulfan 25 EC @ 1000ml/hae1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
81.44%e1
Setting
Datia district in Bundel Khand zonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“a field experiment was carried out during kharif seasons of 2016-17 and 2017-18 in the farmers’ fields at Imalia and Kakraua villages of Datia district in Bundel Khand zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of three components i.e. pheromone trap, timely mechanical control and application of Carbosulfan 25 EC @ 1000ml/ha at 20 days interval after 20 days of planting (M5) was found most effective in reduction of shoot damage (76.59%) and fruit damage (81.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal mean yield per field was highest under M5 (227.00 q/ha).

Treatment
M5e2
Outcome
mean yield of Brinjal per fielde2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
227.00 q/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean yield of Brinjal per field was recorded in M5 (227.00 q/ha) which is 30.63 per cent more than untreated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal mean yield per field under M5 was 30.63 per cent higher than in the untreated field.

Treatment
M5e2
Outcome
mean yield of Brinjal per fielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
30.63 per cente2
Comparator
untreated fielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean yield of Brinjal per field was recorded in M5 (227.00 q/ha) which is 30.63 per cent more than untreated field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM combination M5 gave the highest gross returns (Rs. 181840/ha) in brinjal.

Treatment
IPM combination M5e3
Outcome
gross returnse3
Direction
higheste3
Value
Rs. 181840/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“IPM combination M5 provided the highest gross returns (Rs. 181840/ha) and highest net return Rs. 135790/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM combination M5 gave the highest net return (Rs. 135790/ha) in brinjal.

Treatment
IPM combination M5e3
Outcome
net returne3
Direction
higheste3
Value
Rs. 135790/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“IPM combination M5 provided the highest gross returns (Rs. 181840/ha) and highest net return Rs. 135790/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination M4 gave the highest brinjal benefit cost ratio (4.19).

Treatment
M4e4
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe4
Direction
higheste4
Value
4.19e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest benefit cost ratio of 4.19 was obtained from M4 followed by M5, M2, M6, M3 and M1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit cost ratio of M5 was statistically on par with M2 and M6 in brinjal.

Treatment
M5e5
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe5
Direction
statistically on pare5
Comparator
M2 and M6e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, benefit cost ratio was found in M5 is statistically on par with M2 and M6 similarly, another combination M6 statistically at par with M2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit cost ratio of M6 was statistically at par with M2 in brinjal.

Treatment
M6e5
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe5
Direction
statistically at pare5
Comparator
M2e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Assessment of integrated shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis) management practices in brinjal field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, benefit cost ratio was found in M5 is statistically on par with M2 and M6 similarly, another combination M6 statistically at par with M2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1265 · show in text ↑

carbosulfan · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

pheromone · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ipm · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results differ

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

trap barrier · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.