Abstract
A field experiment was carried out to investigate the “Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) cv. Kashi Pragati”. during August to October 2014 at Vegetable Research Field, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj (U.P.). Different levels and combination of bio-fertilizers and inorganic manures was applied to assess the vegetative growth, yield and Quality characteristics of Okra. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design (FRBD) with sixteen treatments and three replications. The maximum plant height (167.83 cm) and maximum number of leafs (32.23) also were observed in the treatment T16 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@120:60:60). Average fruit length was found in maximum treatment T11 (PSB+NPK+@100:50:50) 13.06 cm than other treatment. Regarding the different parameters of growth, yield and quality significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00), Diameter of stem (1.94 cm), Days taken to first flower appearance (38.73), Days taken to 50% flowering (55.03), diameter of fresh fruit (1.39 cm), average fruit weight (12.00 g), number of fruit per plant (22.17), fruit yield per plant (266.05 g), Total yield of fruits (167.52 q/h), Total seed yield per plant (23.10 g), Ascorbic acid (19.03 mg/100g), TSS (14.830 Brix), Incidence of Y.V.M.V. (10.95%) and economically better than all treatment] were reported in the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
T16 gave maximum plant height of 167.83 cm.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- Kashi Pragatit0
- Treatment
- T16 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@120:60:60)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 167.83 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The maximum plant height (167.83 cm) and maximum number of leafs (32.23) also were observed in the treatment T16 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@120:60:60)”
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) cv. Kashi Pragati”
Claim · model-written summary
T16 gave maximum leaf count of 32.23.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Material
- Kashi Pragatit0
- Treatment
- T16 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@120:60:60)e0
- Outcome
- number of leafse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 32.23e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum plant height (167.83 cm) and maximum number of leafs (32.23) also were observed in the treatment T16 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@120:60:60)”
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) cv. Kashi Pragati”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 gave maximum fruit length of 13.06 cm.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T11 (PSB+NPK+@100:50:50)e0
- Outcome
- Average fruit lengthe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 13.06 cme0
- Comparator
- other treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Average fruit length was found in maximum treatment T11 (PSB+NPK+@100:50:50) 13.06 cm than other treatment”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave 27.00 nodes, significantly higher than other treatments.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- No. of nodese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27.00e0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave stem diameter of 1.94 cm.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Diameter of steme0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 1.94 cme0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Diameter of stem (1.94 cm)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave 38.73 days to first flower appearance.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Days taken to first flower appearancee0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 38.73e0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days taken to first flower appearance (38.73)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave 55.03 days to 50% flowering.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Days taken to 50% floweringe0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 55.03e0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Days taken to 50% flowering (55.03)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave fruit diameter of 1.39 cm.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- diameter of fresh fruite0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 1.39 cme0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“diameter of fresh fruit (1.39 cm)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave average fruit weight of 12.00 g.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- average fruit weighte0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 12.00 ge0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average fruit weight (12.00 g)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave 22.17 fruits per plant.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- number of fruit per plante0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 22.17e0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fruit per plant (22.17)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave fruit yield of 266.05 g per plant.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- fruit yield per plante0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 266.05 ge0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit yield per plant (266.05 g)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave total fruit yield of 167.52 q/h.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Total yield of fruitse0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 167.52 q/he0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total yield of fruits (167.52 q/h)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave total seed yield of 23.10 g per plant.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Total seed yield per plante0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 23.10 ge0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total seed yield per plant (23.10 g)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave ascorbic acid of 19.03 mg/100g.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- Ascorbic acide0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 19.03 mg/100ge0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ascorbic acid (19.03 mg/100g)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 gave TSS of 14.830 Brix.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 14.830 Brixe0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TSS (14.830 Brix)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
e3“significantly higher [No. of nodes (27.00)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had Y.V.M.V. incidence of 10.95%.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)e1
- Interactor
- Y.V.M.V.e0pathogen
- Outcome
- Incidence of Y.V.M.V.e0
- Value
- 10.95%e0
- Comparator
- all treatmente2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Incidence of Y.V.M.V. (10.95%)”
t0“Okra”
e1“the treatment T12 (Azotobactor+PSB+NPK@100:50:50)”
e2“economically better than all treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 was economically better than other treatments.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- economically bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- all treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economically better than all treatment”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
203 papers more in this group
See all 207 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.