Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of irrigation, pruning severity & nitrogen fertilization on fruit quality of plum cv. Santa Rosa

Ashima Suklabaidya; Kuldeep Mehta

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to standardize the renewal pruning intensities under different irrigation & nitrogen levels for getting better yield & quality fruits in Santa Rosa plum. There were three irrigation levels, four pruning severities and two nitrogen levels. Pruning was done in the month of January every year. Pruning treatments exhibited a significant effect on fruit quality during both the years of study. Irrigation at 20 per cent soil moisture depletion of field capacity resulted in higher tree growth, fruit size and quality fruits. Fruit weight, volume, size, fruit firmness (75 % of HB) pruned trees whereas fruit yield was higher in lightly (25 % of HB) and normal pruned trees. Maximum reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugars were observed in I3 and minimum in I1 treatment. Reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugars in fruits tended to increase significantly with the increasing pruning severity. Among the nitrogen fertilization treatments, maximum was recorded at N1as compared to N2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning treatments significantly affected fruit quality in both years.

Treatment
Pruning treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning treatments exhibited a significant effect on fruit quality during both the years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 20 percent soil moisture depletion produced higher tree growth, fruit size and quality.

Treatment
Irrigation at 20 per cent soil moisture depletion of field capacitye0
Outcome
tree growth, fruit size and quality fruitse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 20 per cent soil moisture depletion of field capacity resulted in higher tree growth, fruit size and quality fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight, volume, size and firmness were associated with 75% of HB pruning.

Treatment
75 % of HBe0
Outcome
Fruit weight, volume, size, fruit firmnesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit weight, volume, size, fruit firmness (75 % of HB) pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield was higher in lightly and normally pruned trees.

Treatment
lightly (25 % of HB) and normal pruned treese0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield was higher in lightly (25 % of HB) and normal pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing, total and non-reducing sugars were maximal in I3 and minimal in I1.

Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugarse0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
I1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugars were observed in I3 and minimum in I1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit reducing, total and non-reducing sugars rose significantly with pruning severity.

Treatment
increasing pruning severitye0
Outcome
Reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing sugars, total sugars and non-reducing sugars in fruits tended to increase significantly with the increasing pruning severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum among nitrogen fertilization treatments was at N1 relative to N2; the endpoint is unspecified.

Material
N1e0
Outcome
maximume0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
N2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the nitrogen fertilization treatments, maximum was recorded at N1as compared to N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum cv. Santa Rosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–103 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

soil water · quality: general · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.