Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of phosphorus and sulphur fertilization on yield and quality of mustard & chickpea in intercropping system under different soil moisture regimes

Satybhan Singh; O.V.S. Thenua; Virendra Singh

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This field study was conducted during Rabi season 2009-10 and 2010-11 to study the effect of different levels of phosphorus, sulphur, irrigation and intercropping on yield and quality of mustard and chickpea at agronomic research farm of Amar Singh (P.G.) College, Lakhaoti, Bulandshahr (U.P.). On the basis of results of the experiment it may be concluded that the 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigation, one each at pre-flowering and grain filling stages of mustard in mustard and chickpea intercropping system could be necessary for obtained higher yield, oil content in mustard, protein content in chickpea and maximum benefit: cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 kg P2O5 per ha and 40 kg S per ha with two irrigations could be necessary for higher mustard yield and oil content.

Taxon
mustarde1
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigatione0
Outcome
yield, oil contente1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“could be necessary for obtained higher yield, oil content in mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same P, S and irrigation regime could be necessary for higher chickpea protein content.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigatione0
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield, oil content in mustard, protein content in chickpea and maximum benefit: cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same P, S and irrigation regime could be necessary for the maximum benefit:cost ratio in the mustard and chickpea intercropping system.

Taxon
mustard and chickpeae3
Treatment
60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigatione0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe2
Direction
maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the 60 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 40 kg S ha-1 with two time irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher yield, oil content in mustard, protein content in chickpea and maximum benefit: cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–661 · show in text ↑
e3

“mustard and chickpea intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–531 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.