Abstract
A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Agricultural Research Station, Ragolu, Andhra Pradesh, with four establishment techniques Viz., dry direct sown rice, aerobic rice, machine planting and normal (manual) planting as main plots and five nitrogen levels (90,120,150,180 and 210 kg ha-1) as sub plots in a split plot design on sandy clay loam soil. The study revealed that among crop establishments of rice root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice. Among the nitrogen levels studied, the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Machine planting significantly increased rice root volume relative to aerobic rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- machine plantinge0
- Outcome
- root volumee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- aerobic ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Machine planting significantly increased rice root dry weight relative to aerobic rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- machine plantinge0
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- aerobic ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Machine planting significantly increased rice uptake of N, P and K at harvest relative to aerobic rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- machine plantinge0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P and K at harveste0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- aerobic ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Machine planting significantly increased rice grain yield relative to aerobic rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- machine plantinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- aerobic ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Machine planting significantly increased rice straw yield relative to aerobic rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- machine plantinge0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- aerobic ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice was significantly higher with machine planting and these parameters were the lowest with aerobic rice”
Claim · model-written summary
At 210 kg N ha-1, rice root volume was maximal and comparable with 180 and 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- root volumee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study”
Claim · model-written summary
At 210 kg N ha-1, rice root dry weight was maximal and comparable with 180 and 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study”
Claim · model-written summary
At 210 kg N ha-1, rice uptake of N, P and K at harvest was maximal and comparable with 180 and 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P and K at harveste0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study”
Claim · model-written summary
At 210 kg N ha-1, rice grain yield was maximal and comparable with 180 and 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study”
Claim · model-written summary
At 210 kg N ha-1, rice straw yield was maximal and comparable with 180 and 150 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root volume, root dry weight, uptake of N, P and K at harvest, grain yield and straw yield of rice were recorded with application of nitrogen @ 210 kg N ha-1 and were comparable with application of 180 and 150 kg N ha-1 during both the years of study”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.