Abstract
The field experiment to assess the influence of consortium biofertilizer PGPR Mix –I and nutrient levels on the quality characters in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) was conducted at College of Agriculture Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. The treatments involved four levels of biofertilizer (PGPR Mix- I) and three levels of nutrients (SDN - standard dose of NPK, 50: 50: 100 kg ha-1). The individual effect of the biofertilizer revealed the highest nutrient, starch and protein contents and the lowest HCN content in tubers of plants fertilized with PGPR Mix - I (5% and 2%). Among the different levels of nutrients, 100 per cent SDN produced maximum starch content (27.81%). Highest protein (2.63%) and lowest HCN (49.10 mg kg-1) content were registered in 75 and 50 per cent of SDN respectively, the latter being on par with 75 per cent SDN. Neither the starch nor the protein was affected by the interaction, whereas the treatment combination PGPR Mix - I liquid (5%) + SDN (75%) recorded the lowest HCN. Thus it can be concluded that the quality of cassava tubers were positively influenced by the biofertilizer consortium and NPK levels and better tuber quality was realised with liquid PGPR Mix-I application at 5% and NPK dose of 37.5: 37.5: 75 kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR Mix-I biofertilizer gave the highest nutrient, starch and protein contents in cassava tubers.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)
Manihot esculentat0 - Organ / stage
- tuberse1
- Treatment
- PGPR Mix - Ie1
- Outcome
- nutrient, starch and protein contentse1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- College of Agriculture Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Keralae7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e1“revealed the highest nutrient, starch and protein contents and the lowest HCN content in tubers of plants fertilized with PGPR Mix - I (5% and 2%)”
e7“conducted at College of Agriculture Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala”
Claim · model-written summary
PGPR Mix-I biofertilizer gave the lowest HCN content in cassava tubers.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Organ / stage
- tuberse1
- Treatment
- PGPR Mix - Ie1
- Outcome
- HCN contente1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Setting
- College of Agriculture Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Keralae7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e1“revealed the highest nutrient, starch and protein contents and the lowest HCN content in tubers of plants fertilized with PGPR Mix - I (5% and 2%)”
e7“conducted at College of Agriculture Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala”
Claim · model-written summary
100 per cent SDN gave the maximum starch content in cassava (27.81%).
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent SDNe2
- Outcome
- starch contente2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 27.81%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e2“Among the different levels of nutrients, 100 per cent SDN produced maximum starch content (27.81%)”
Claim · model-written summary
75 per cent SDN gave the highest protein content in cassava (2.63%).
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- 75 per cent SDNe3
- Outcome
- proteine3
- Direction
- Higheste3
- Value
- 2.63%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e3“Highest protein (2.63%) and lowest HCN (49.10 mg kg-1) content were registered in 75 and 50 per cent of SDN respectively, the latter being on par with 75 per cent SDN”
Claim · model-written summary
50 per cent of SDN gave the lowest HCN content in cassava (49.10 mg kg-1).
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- 50 per cent of SDNe3
- Outcome
- HCNe3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 49.10 mg kg-1e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e3“Highest protein (2.63%) and lowest HCN (49.10 mg kg-1) content were registered in 75 and 50 per cent of SDN respectively, the latter being on par with 75 per cent SDN”
Claim · model-written summary
The HCN content at 50 per cent of SDN was on par with that at 75 per cent SDN.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- 50 per cent of SDNe3
- Outcome
- HCNe3
- Direction
- on pare3
- Comparator
- 75 per cent SDNe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e3“Highest protein (2.63%) and lowest HCN (49.10 mg kg-1) content were registered in 75 and 50 per cent of SDN respectively, the latter being on par with 75 per cent SDN”
Claim · model-written summary
Neither starch nor protein in cassava tubers was affected by the biofertilizer and NPK interaction.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Outcome
- starch nor the proteine4
- Qualifier
- affected by the interactione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e4“Neither the starch nor the protein was affected by the interaction, whereas the treatment combination PGPR Mix - I liquid (5%) + SDN (75%) recorded the lowest HCN”
Claim · model-written summary
The combination of PGPR Mix-I liquid (5%) with SDN (75%) gave the lowest HCN in cassava.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- PGPR Mix - I liquid (5%) + SDN (75%)e4
- Outcome
- HCNe4
- Direction
- loweste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e4“Neither the starch nor the protein was affected by the interaction, whereas the treatment combination PGPR Mix - I liquid (5%) + SDN (75%) recorded the lowest HCN”
Claim · model-written summary
Liquid PGPR Mix-I at 5% with an NPK dose of 37.5: 37.5: 75 kg ha-1 is the best option for cassava tuber quality.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- liquid PGPR Mix-I application at 5%e5
- Outcome
- tuber qualitye5
- Value
- 37.5: 37.5: 75 kg ha-1e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e5“better tuber quality was realised with liquid PGPR Mix-I application at 5% and NPK dose of 37.5: 37.5: 75 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Cassava tuber quality was positively influenced by the biofertilizer consortium and NPK levels.
- Taxon
- cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)Manihot esculentat0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consortium and NPK levelse6
- Outcome
- quality of cassava tuberse6
- Direction
- positively influencede6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”
e6“the quality of cassava tubers were positively influenced by the biofertilizer consortium and NPK levels”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: protein · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.