Abstract
The present investigation was conducted at Horticulture Farm, Department of Horticulture, IGKV Raipur (C.G.) during the rabi season of 2010-11. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with four replications. The cultivar under this investigation was “Candyman”. There were ten treatments combinations under the study namely, T1: Control, T2: 50% RDF, T3: 75% RDF, T4: 100% RDF, T5: FYM 10 t/ha, T6: 50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha, T7: 75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha, T8: Vermicompost Only 3t/ha, T9: 50% RDF + Vermicompost 3t/ha, T10:75% RDF + Vermicompost 3 t/ha. The Recommendad dose of fertilizer is i.e. 120:80:60/ha. The result indicated that the T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better in growth character namely, days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plant, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leaf, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corm, total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant. However length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikes was found maximum in treatment T10 (75% RDF+ Vermicompost 3 t/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better than the other treatments in days to sprout, numbers of sprouts and number of leaves per plant.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plante1
- Direction
- performed bettere1
GladiolusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloru L.)”
e1“the T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better in growth character namely, days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plant, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leaf, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corm, total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 performed better in girth of plant base, width of leaf and height of the plant.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leafe1
- Direction
- performed bettere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloru L.)”
e1“the T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better in growth character namely, days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plant, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leaf, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corm, total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 performed better in days to spike emergence, diameter of corm and weight per corm.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corme1
- Direction
- performed bettere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloru L.)”
e1“the T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better in growth character namely, days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plant, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leaf, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corm, total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T7 performed better in total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + FYM 10 t/hae1
- Outcome
- total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plante1
- Direction
- performed bettere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloru L.)”
e1“the T7 (75% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha) performed better in growth character namely, days to sprout, numbers of sprouts, number of leaves per plant, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of the plant up to tip of leaf, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight per corm, total corm weights per plot and number of corms per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T10 (75% RDF + Vermicompost 3 t/ha) gave the maximum length of spike, number of florets per spike and vase life of cut spikes.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF+ Vermicompost 3 t/hae1
- Outcome
- length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikese1
- Direction
- maximume1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandifloru L.)”
e1“However length of the spike, number of florets per spikes, vase life of cut spikes was found maximum in treatment T10 (75% RDF+ Vermicompost 3 t/ha)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · GladiolusPositive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →fertilization · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.