Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Can medicinal plants provide sustainable economic security to dry land farmers

Pushpa Tn; KB Umesha; D Srikantaprasad; et al.

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted on intercropping of medicinal crops viz., ashwagandha, garden rue, roselle and holy basil with pigeon pea and nipped castor in alfisols of eastern dry zone of Karnataka in kharif 2012. Intercropping of ashwagandha significantly reduced the growth and yield of field crops. The pigeon pea /castor + garden rue system performed better than sole crops of field crops. The yield of medicinal crops reduced due to intercropping. Sole crop of garden rue recorded significantly higher dry herb yield (1.43 t ha-1). Sole crop of roselle recorded highest fresh calyx yield (3.37 t ha-1) followed by pigeon pea intercropping (2.94 t ha-1) and castor intercropping (2.47 t ha-1). Pigeon pea + garden rue recorded maximum LER, ATER and net returns of 1.98, 1.82 and ` 29533.00 ha-1, respectively with a B: C ratio of 0.89.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping ashwagandha significantly reduced field crop growth and yield.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Intercropping of ashwagandhae1
Interactor
ashwagandhaWithania somniferae1other
Outcome
growth and yield of field cropse1
Direction
reducede1
Setting
Karnatakae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Withania somnifera
Withania somnifera · InteractorSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study was conducted on intercropping of medicinal crops viz., ashwagandha, garden rue, roselle and holy basil with pigeon pea and nipped castor in alfisols of eastern dry zone of Karnataka in kharif 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping of ashwagandha significantly reduced the growth and yield of field crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea and castor with garden rue performed better than sole field crops.

Taxon
pigeon pea /castorCajanus cajanRicinus communise0
Treatment
garden ruee0
Interactor
garden ruee0other
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
sole crops of field cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pigeon pea /castor + garden rue system performed better than sole crops of field crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced medicinal crop yield.

Taxon
medicinal cropse0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
yield of medicinal cropse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This study was conducted on intercropping of medicinal crops viz., ashwagandha, garden rue, roselle and holy basil with pigeon pea and nipped castor in alfisols of eastern dry zone of Karnataka in kharif 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield of medicinal crops reduced due to intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–448 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole garden rue yielded 1.43 t ha-1 of dry herb, significantly higher.

Taxon
garden ruee0
Treatment
Sole crope0
Outcome
dry herb yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.43 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Sole crop of garden rue recorded significantly higher dry herb yield (1.43 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole roselle had the highest fresh calyx yield, 3.37 t ha-1.

Treatment
Sole crope0
Outcome
fresh calyx yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.37 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole crop of roselle recorded highest fresh calyx yield (3.37 t ha-1) followed by pigeon pea intercropping (2.94 t ha-1) and castor intercropping (2.47 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roselle fresh calyx yield with pigeon pea intercropping was 2.94 t ha-1.

Treatment
pigeon pea intercroppinge0
Outcome
fresh calyx yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
2.94 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole crop of roselle recorded highest fresh calyx yield (3.37 t ha-1) followed by pigeon pea intercropping (2.94 t ha-1) and castor intercropping (2.47 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roselle fresh calyx yield with castor intercropping was 2.47 t ha-1.

Treatment
castor intercroppinge0
Outcome
fresh calyx yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
2.47 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus sabdariffa
Hibiscus sabdariffa · TaxonInvertzoo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole crop of roselle recorded highest fresh calyx yield (3.37 t ha-1) followed by pigeon pea intercropping (2.94 t ha-1) and castor intercropping (2.47 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–693 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus garden rue recorded maximum LER of 1.98.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
garden ruee0
Interactor
garden ruee0other
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeon pea + garden rue recorded maximum LER, ATER and net returns of 1.98, 1.82 and ` 29533.00 ha-1, respectively with a B: C ratio of 0.89.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus garden rue recorded maximum ATER of 1.82.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
garden ruee0
Interactor
garden ruee0other
Outcome
ATERe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeon pea + garden rue recorded maximum LER, ATER and net returns of 1.98, 1.82 and ` 29533.00 ha-1, respectively with a B: C ratio of 0.89.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea plus garden rue recorded maximum net returns of ` 29533.00 ha-1.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
garden ruee0
Interactor
garden ruee0other
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
` 29533.00 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeon pea + garden rue recorded maximum LER, ATER and net returns of 1.98, 1.82 and ` 29533.00 ha-1, respectively with a B: C ratio of 0.89.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pigeon pea plus garden rue system had a benefit:cost ratio of 0.89.

Taxon
Pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Value
0.89e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeon pea + garden rue recorded maximum LER, ATER and net returns of 1.98, 1.82 and ` 29533.00 ha-1, respectively with a B: C ratio of 0.89.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–835 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.